Axmi554 delta-endotoxin gene and methods for its use

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods for conferring pesticidal activity to bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues and seeds are provided. Compositions comprising a coding sequence for a toxin polypeptide are provided. The coding sequences can be used in DNA constructs or expression cassettes for transformation and expression in plants and bacteria. Compositions also comprise transformed bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues, and seeds. In particular, isolated toxin nucleic acid molecules are provided. Additionally, amino acid sequences corresponding to the polynucleotides are encompassed, and antibodies specifically binding to those amino acid sequences. In particular, the present invention provides for isolated nucleic acid molecules comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:4-11, or the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1-3, as well as variants and fragments thereof.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser.No. 62/241,220, filed Oct. 14, 2015, the contents of which are hereinincorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of molecular biology. Provided arenovel genes that encode pesticidal proteins. These proteins and thenucleic acid sequences that encode them are useful in preparingpesticidal formulations and in the production of transgenicpest-resistant plants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Bacillus thuringiensis is a Gram-positive spore forming soil bacteriumcharacterized by its ability to produce crystalline inclusions that arespecifically toxic to certain orders and species of insects, but areharmless to plants and other non-targeted organisms. For this reason,compositions including Bacillus thuringiensis strains or theirinsecticidal proteins can be used as environmentally-acceptableinsecticides to control agricultural insect pests or insect vectors fora variety of human or animal diseases.

Crystal (Cry) proteins (delta-endotoxins) from Bacillus thuringiensishave potent insecticidal activity against predominantly Lepidopteran,Hemipteran, Dipteran, and Coleopteran larvae. These proteins also haveshown activity against Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Phthiraptera, Mallophaga,and Acari pest orders, as well as other invertebrate orders such asNemathelminthes, Platyhelminthes, and Sarcomastigorphora (Feitelson(1993) The Bacillus Thuringiensis family tree. In Advanced EngineeredPesticides, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.) These proteins wereoriginally classified as CryI to CryV based primarily on theirinsecticidal activity. The major classes were Lepidoptera-specific (I),Lepidoptera- and Diptera-specific (II), Coleoptera-specific (III),Diptera-specific (IV), and nematode-specific (V) and (VI). The proteinswere further classified into subfamilies; more highly related proteinswithin each family were assigned divisional letters such as Cry1A,Cry1B, Cry1C, etc. Even more closely related proteins within eachdivision were given names such as Cry1C1, Cry1C2, etc.

A nomenclature was described for the Cry genes based upon amino acidsequence homology rather than insect target specificity (Crickmore etal. (1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813). In thisclassification, each toxin is assigned a unique name incorporating aprimary rank (an Arabic number), a secondary rank (an uppercase letter),a tertiary rank (a lowercase letter), and a quaternary rank (anotherArabic number). Roman numerals have been exchanged for Arabic numeralsin the primary rank. Proteins with less than 45% sequence identity havedifferent primary ranks, and the criteria for secondary and tertiaryranks are 78% and 95%, respectively.

The crystal protein does not exhibit insecticidal activity until it hasbeen ingested and solubilized in the insect midgut. The ingestedprotoxin is hydrolyzed by proteases in the insect digestive tract to anactive toxic molecule. (Hifte and Whiteley (1989) Microbiol. Rev.53:242-255). This toxin binds to apical brush border receptors in themidgut of the target larvae and inserts into the apical membranecreating ion channels or pores, resulting in larval death.

Delta-endotoxins generally have five conserved sequence domains, andthree conserved structural domains (see, for example, de Maagd et al.(2001) Trends Genetics 17:193-199). The first conserved structuraldomain consists of seven alpha helices and is involved in membraneinsertion and pore formation. Domain II consists of three beta-sheetsarranged in a Greek key configuration, and domain III consists of twoantiparallel beta-sheets in “jelly-roll” formation (de Maagd et al.,2001, supra). Domains II and III are involved in receptor recognitionand binding, and are therefore considered determinants of toxinspecificity.

Aside from delta-endotoxins, there are several other known classes ofpesticidal protein toxins. The VIP1/VIP2 toxins (see, for example, U.S.Pat. No. 5,770,696) are binary pesticidal toxins that exhibit strongactivity on insects by a mechanism believed to involve receptor-mediatedendocytosis followed by cellular toxification, similar to the mode ofaction of other binary (“A/B”) toxins. A/B toxins such as VIP, C2, CDT,CST, or the B. anthracis edema and lethal toxins initially interact withtarget cells via a specific, receptor-mediated binding of “B” componentsas monomers. These monomers then form homoheptamers. The “B”heptamer-receptor complex then acts as a docking platform thatsubsequently binds and allows the translocation of an enzymatic “A”component(s) into the cytosol via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Onceinside the cell's cytosol, “A” components inhibit normal cell functionby, for example, ADP-ribosylation of G-actin, or increasingintracellular levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP). See Barth et al. (2004)Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:373-402.

The intensive use of B. thuringiensis-based insecticides has alreadygiven rise to resistance in field populations of the diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella (Ferre and Van Rie (2002) Annu. Rev. Entomol.47:501-533). The most common mechanism of resistance is the reduction ofbinding of the toxin to its specific midgut receptor(s). This may alsoconfer cross-resistance to other toxins that share the same receptor(Ferre and Van Rie (2002)).

Because of the devastation that insects can confer, and the improvementin yield by controlling insect pests, there is a continual need todiscover new forms of pesticidal toxins.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Compositions and methods for conferring pesticidal activity to bacteria,plants, plant cells, tissues and seeds are provided. Compositionsinclude nucleic acid molecules encoding sequences for pesticidal andinsectidal polypeptides, vectors comprising those nucleic acidmolecules, and host cells comprising the vectors. Compositions alsoinclude the pesticidal polypeptide sequences and antibodies to thosepolypeptides. The nucleotide sequences can be used in DNA constructs orexpression cassettes for transformation and expression in organisms,including microorganisms and plants. The nucleotide or amino acidsequences may be synthetic sequences that have been designed forexpression in an organism including, but not limited to, a microorganismor a plant. Compositions also comprise bacteria, plants, plant cells,tissues, and seeds comprising the nucleotide sequence of the invention.

In particular, isolated or recombinant nucleic acid molecules areprovided that encode a pesticidal protein. Additionally, amino acidsequences corresponding to the pesticidal protein are encompassed. Inparticular, the present invention provides for an isolated orrecombinant nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequenceencoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:4-11 or a nucleotidesequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1-3, as well as biologically-activevariants and fragments thereof. Nucleotide sequences that arecomplementary to a nucleotide sequence of the invention, or thathybridize to a sequence of the invention or a complement thereof arealso encompassed. Further provided are vectors, host cells, plants, andseeds comprising the nucleotide sequences of the invention, ornucleotide sequences encoding the amino acid sequences of the invention,as well as biologically-active variants and fragments thereof.

Methods are provided for producing the polypeptides of the invention,and for using those polypeptides for controlling or killing alepidopteran, hemipteran, coleopteran, nematode, or dipteran pest.Methods and kits for detecting the nucleic acids and polypeptides of theinvention in a sample are also included.

The compositions and methods of the invention are useful for theproduction of organisms with enhanced pest resistance or tolerance.These organisms and compositions comprising the organisms are desirablefor agricultural purposes. The compositions of the invention are alsouseful for generating altered or improved proteins that have pesticidalactivity, or for detecting the presence of pesticidal proteins ornucleic acids in products or organisms.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention is drawn to compositions and methods forregulating pest resistance or tolerance in organisms, particularlyplants or plant cells. By “resistance” is intended that the pest (e.g.,insect) is killed upon ingestion or other contact with the polypeptidesof the invention. By “tolerance” is intended an impairment or reductionin the movement, feeding, reproduction, or other functions of the pest.The methods involve transforming organisms with a nucleotide sequenceencoding a pesticidal protein of the invention. In particular, thenucleotide sequences of the invention are useful for preparing plantsand microorganisms that possess pesticidal activity. Thus, transformedbacteria, plants, plant cells, plant tissues and seeds are provided.Compositions are pesticidal nucleic acids and proteins of Bacillus orother species. The sequences find use in the construction of expressionvectors for subsequent transformation into organisms of interest, asprobes for the isolation of other homologous (or partially homologous)genes, and for the generation of altered pesticidal proteins by methodsknown in the art, such as domain swapping or DNA shuffling, for example,with members of the Cry1, Cry2, and Cry9 families of endotoxins. Theproteins find use in controlling or killing lepidopteran, hemipteran,coleopteran, dipteran, and nematode pest populations and for producingcompositions with pesticidal activity.

By “pesticidal toxin” or “pesticidal protein” is intended a toxin thathas toxic activity against one or more pests, including, but not limitedto, members of the Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera orders, or theNematoda phylum, or a protein that has homology to such a protein.Pesticidal proteins have been isolated from organisms including, forexample, Bacillus sp., Clostridium bifermentans and Paenibacilluspopilliae. Pesticidal proteins include amino acid sequences deduced fromthe full-length nucleotide sequences disclosed herein, and amino acidsequences that are shorter than the full-length sequences, either due tothe use of an alternate downstream start site, or due to processing thatproduces a shorter protein having pesticidal activity. Processing mayoccur in the organism the protein is expressed in, or in the pest afteringestion of the protein.

Pesticidal proteins encompass delta-endotoxins. Delta-endotoxins includeproteins identified as cryl through cry72, cyt1 and cyt2, and Cyt-liketoxin. There are currently over 250 known species of delta-endotoxinswith a wide range of specificities and toxicities. For an expansive listsee Crickmore et al. (1998), Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813, andfor regular updates see Crickmore et al. (2003) “Bacillus thuringiensistoxin nomenclature,” atwww.biols.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/index.

Thus, provided herein are novel isolated or recombinant nucleotidesequences that confer pesticidal activity. These nucleotide sequencesencode polypeptides with homology to known delta-endotoxins or binarytoxins. Also provided are the amino acid sequences of the pesticidalproteins. The protein resulting from translation of this gene allowscells to control or kill pests that ingest it.

Isolated Nucleic Acid Molecules, and Variants and Fragments Thereof

One aspect of the invention pertains to isolated or recombinant nucleicacid molecules comprising nucleotide sequences encoding pesticidalproteins and polypeptides or biologically active portions thereof, aswell as nucleic acid molecules sufficient for use as hybridizationprobes to identify nucleic acid molecules encoding proteins with regionsof sequence homology.

Also encompassed herein are nucleotide sequences capable of hybridizingto the nucleotide sequences of the invention under stringent conditionsas defined elsewhere herein. As used herein, the term “nucleic acidmolecule” is intended to include DNA molecules (e.g., recombinant DNA,cDNA or genomic DNA) and RNA molecules (e.g., mRNA) and analogs of theDNA or RNA generated using nucleotide analogs. The nucleic acid moleculecan be single-stranded or double-stranded, but preferably isdouble-stranded DNA. The term “recombinant” encompasses polynucleotidesor polypeptides that have been manipulated with respect to the nativepolynucleotide or polypeptide, such that the polynucleotide orpolypeptide differs (e.g., in chemical composition or structure) fromwhat is occurring in nature. In another embodiment, a “recombinant”polynucleotide is free of internal sequences (i.e. introns) thatnaturally occur in the genomic DNA of the organism from which thepolynucleotide is derived. A typical example of such polynucleotide is aso-called Complementary DNA (cDNA).

An isolated or recombinant nucleic acid (or DNA) is used herein to referto a nucleic acid (or DNA) that is no longer in its natural environment,for example in an in vitro or in a recombinant bacterial or plant hostcell. In some embodiments, an isolated or recombinant nucleic acid isfree of sequences (preferably protein encoding sequences) that naturallyflank the nucleic acid (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends ofthe nucleic acid) in the genomic DNA of the organism from which thenucleic acid is derived. For purposes of the invention, “isolated” whenused to refer to nucleic acid molecules excludes isolated chromosomes.For example, in various embodiments, the isolated delta-endotoxinencoding nucleic acid molecule can contain less than about 5 kb, 4 kb, 3kb, 2 kb, 1 kb, 0.5 kb, or 0.1 kb of nucleotide sequences that naturallyflank the nucleic acid molecule in genomic DNA of the cell from whichthe nucleic acid is derived. In various embodiments, a delta-endotoxinprotein that is substantially free of cellular material includespreparations of protein having less than about 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5% (bydry weight) of non-delta-endotoxin protein (also referred to herein as a“contaminating protein”). In some embodiments, the recombinant nucleicacid of the invention comprises one or more nucleotide substitutionsrelative to SEQ ID NO:1, or a variant or fragment thereof.

Nucleotide sequences encoding the proteins of the present inventioninclude the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1-3, and variants,fragments, and complements thereof. By “complement” is intended anucleotide sequence that is sufficiently complementary to a givennucleotide sequence such that it can hybridize to the given nucleotidesequence to thereby form a stable duplex. The corresponding amino acidsequences for the pesticidal proteins encoded by these nucleotidesequences are set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11.

Nucleic acid molecules that are fragments of these nucleotide sequencesencoding pesticidal proteins are also encompassed by the presentinvention. By “fragment” is intended a portion of the nucleotidesequence encoding a pesticidal protein. A fragment of a nucleotidesequence may encode a biologically active portion of a pesticidalprotein, or it may be a fragment that can be used as a hybridizationprobe or PCR primer using methods disclosed below. Nucleic acidmolecules that are fragments of a nucleotide sequence encoding apesticidal protein comprise at least about 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500,600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1350, 1400 contiguousnucleotides, or up to the number of nucleotides present in a full-lengthnucleotide sequence encoding a pesticidal protein disclosed herein,depending upon the intended use. By “contiguous” nucleotides is intendednucleotide residues that are immediately adjacent to one another.Fragments of the nucleotide sequences of the present invention willencode protein fragments that retain the biological activity of thepesticidal protein and, hence, retain pesticidal activity. Thus,biologically-active fragments of the polypeptides disclosed herein arealso encompassed. By “retains activity” is intended that the fragmentwill have at least about 30%, at least about 50%, at least about 70%,80%, 90%, 95% or higher of the pesticidal activity of the pesticidalprotein. In one embodiment, the pesticidal activity is coleoptericidalactivity. In another embodiment, the pesticidal activity islepidoptericidal activity. In another embodiment, the pesticidalactivity is nematocidal activity. In another embodiment, the pesticidalactivity is diptericidal activity. In another embodiment, the pesticidalactivity is hemiptericidal activity. Methods for measuring pesticidalactivity are well known in the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang(1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83:2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J.252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293;and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated byreference in their entirety.

A fragment of a nucleotide sequence encoding a pesticidal protein thatencodes a biologically active portion of a protein of the invention willencode at least about 15, 25, 30, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250,300, 350, 400, 450 contiguous amino acids, or up to the total number ofamino acids present in a full-length pesticidal protein of theinvention. In some embodiments, the fragment is a proteolytic cleavagefragment. For example, the proteolytic cleavage fragment may have anN-terminal or a C-terminal truncation of at least about 100 amino acids,about 120, about 130, about 140, about 150, or about 160 amino acidsrelative to SEQ ID NO:4-11. In some embodiments, the fragmentsencompassed herein result from the removal of the C-terminalcrystallization domain, e.g., by proteolysis or by insertion of a stopcodon in the coding sequence.

In various embodiments, the nucleic acid of the invention comprises adegenerate nucleic acid of any of SEQ ID NO: 1-3, wherein saiddegenerate nucleotide sequence encodes the same amino acid sequence asany of SEQ ID NO:4-11.

Preferred pesticidal proteins of the present invention are encoded by anucleotide sequence sufficiently identical to the nucleotide sequence ofSEQ ID NO: 1-3, or the pesticidal proteins are sufficiently identical tothe amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11. By “sufficientlyidentical” is intended an amino acid or nucleotide sequence that has atleast about 60% or 65% sequence identity, about 70% or 75% sequenceidentity, about 80% or 85% sequence identity, about 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%,94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or greater sequence identity compared to areference sequence using one of the alignment programs described hereinusing standard parameters. One of skill in the art will recognize thatthese values can be appropriately adjusted to determine correspondingidentity of proteins encoded by two nucleotide sequences by taking intoaccount codon degeneracy, amino acid similarity, reading framepositioning, and the like.

To determine the percent identity of two amino acid sequences or of twonucleic acids, the sequences are aligned for optimal comparisonpurposes. The percent identity between the two sequences is a functionof the number of identical positions shared by the sequences (i.e.,percent identity=number of identical positions/total number of positions(e.g., overlapping positions)×100). In one embodiment, the two sequencesare the same length. In another embodiment, the percent identity iscalculated across the entirety of the reference sequence (i.e., thesequence disclosed herein as any of SEQ ID NO:1-11). The percentidentity between two sequences can be determined using techniquessimilar to those described below, with or without allowing gaps. Incalculating percent identity, typically exact matches are counted. Agap, i.e. a position in an alignment where a residue is present in onesequence but not in the other, is regarded as a position withnon-identical residues.

The determination of percent identity between two sequences can beaccomplished using a mathematical algorithm. A nonlimiting example of amathematical algorithm utilized for the comparison of two sequences isthe algorithm of Karlin and Altschul (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:2264, modified as in Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90:5873-5877. Such an algorithm is incorporated into the BLASTNand BLASTX programs of Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403.BLAST nucleotide searches can be performed with the BLASTN program,score=100, wordlength=12, to obtain nucleotide sequences homologous topesticidal-like nucleic acid molecules of the invention. BLAST proteinsearches can be performed with the BLASTX program, score=50,wordlength=3, to obtain amino acid sequences homologous to pesticidalprotein molecules of the invention. To obtain gapped alignments forcomparison purposes, Gapped BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be utilized asdescribed in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389.Alternatively, PSI-Blast can be used to perform an iterated search thatdetects distant relationships between molecules. See Altschul et al.(1997) supra. When utilizing BLAST, Gapped BLAST, and PSI-Blastprograms, the default parameters of the respective programs (e.g.,BLASTX and BLASTN) can be used. Alignment may also be performed manuallyby inspection.

Another non-limiting example of a mathematical algorithm utilized forthe comparison of sequences is the ClustalW algorithm (Higgins et al.(1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680). ClustalW compares sequences andaligns the entirety of the amino acid or DNA sequence, and thus canprovide data about the sequence conservation of the entire amino acidsequence. The ClustalW algorithm is used in several commerciallyavailable DNA/amino acid analysis software packages, such as the ALIGNXmodule of the Vector NTI Program Suite (Invitrogen Corporation,Carlsbad, Calif.). After alignment of amino acid sequences withClustalW, the percent amino acid identity can be assessed. Anon-limiting example of a software program useful for analysis ofClustalW alignments is GENEDOC™. GENEDOC™ (Karl Nicholas) allowsassessment of amino acid (or DNA) similarity and identity betweenmultiple proteins. Another non-limiting example of a mathematicalalgorithm utilized for the comparison of sequences is the algorithm ofMyers and Miller (1988) CABIOS 4:11-17. Such an algorithm isincorporated into the ALIGN program (version 2.0), which is part of theGCG Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Version 10 (available fromAccelrys, Inc., 9685 Scranton Rd., San Diego, Calif., USA). Whenutilizing the ALIGN program for comparing amino acid sequences, a PAM120weight residue table, a gap length penalty of 12, and a gap penalty of 4can be used.

Unless otherwise stated, GAP Version 10, which uses the algorithm ofNeedleman and Wunsch (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48(3):443-453, will be used todetermine sequence identity or similarity using the followingparameters: % identity and % similarity for a nucleotide sequence usingGAP Weight of 50 and Length Weight of 3, and the nwsgapdna.cmp scoringmatrix; % identity or % similarity for an amino acid sequence using GAPweight of 8 and length weight of 2, and the BLOSUM62 scoring program.Equivalent programs may also be used. By “equivalent program” isintended any sequence comparison program that, for any two sequences inquestion, generates an alignment having identical nucleotide residuematches and an identical percent sequence identity when compared to thecorresponding alignment generated by GAP Version 10.

The invention also encompasses variant nucleic acid molecules.“Variants” of the pesticidal protein encoding nucleotide sequencesinclude those sequences that encode the pesticidal proteins disclosedherein but that differ conservatively because of the degeneracy of thegenetic code as well as those that are sufficiently identical asdiscussed above. Naturally occurring allelic variants can be identifiedwith the use of well-known molecular biology techniques, such aspolymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization techniques as outlinedbelow. Variant nucleotide sequences also include synthetically derivednucleotide sequences that have been generated, for example, by usingsite-directed mutagenesis but which still encode the pesticidal proteinsdisclosed in the present invention as discussed below. Variant proteinsencompassed by the present invention are biologically active, that isthey continue to possess the desired biological activity of the nativeprotein, that is, pesticidal activity. By “retains activity” is intendedthat the variant will have at least about 30%, at least about 50%, atleast about 70%, or at least about 80% of the pesticidal activity of thenative protein. Methods for measuring pesticidal activity are well knownin the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol.83: 2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone etal. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No.5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety.

The skilled artisan will further appreciate that changes can beintroduced by mutation of the nucleotide sequences of the inventionthereby leading to changes in the amino acid sequence of the encodedpesticidal proteins, without altering the biological activity of theproteins. Thus, variant isolated nucleic acid molecules can be createdby introducing one or more nucleotide substitutions, additions, ordeletions into the corresponding nucleotide sequence disclosed herein,such that one or more amino acid substitutions, additions or deletionsare introduced into the encoded protein. Mutations can be introduced bystandard techniques, such as site-directed mutagenesis and PCR-mediatedmutagenesis. Such variant nucleotide sequences are also encompassed bythe present invention.

For example, conservative amino acid substitutions may be made at one ormore, predicted, nonessential amino acid residues. A “nonessential”amino acid residue is a residue that can be altered from the wild-typesequence of a pesticidal protein without altering the biologicalactivity, whereas an “essential” amino acid residue is required forbiological activity. A “conservative amino acid substitution” is one inwhich the amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residuehaving a similar side chain. Families of amino acid residues havingsimilar side chains have been defined in the art. These families includeamino acids with basic side chains (e.g., lysine, arginine, histidine),acidic side chains (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid), uncharged polarside chains (e.g., glycine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine,tyrosine, cysteine), nonpolar side chains (e.g., alanine, valine,leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan),beta-branched side chains (e.g., threonine, valine, isoleucine) andaromatic side chains (e.g., tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan,histidine).

Delta-endotoxins generally have five conserved sequence domains, andthree conserved structural domains (see, for example, de Maagd et al.(2001) Trends Genetics 17:193-199). The first conserved structuraldomain consists of seven alpha helices and is involved in membraneinsertion and pore formation. Domain II consists of three beta-sheetsarranged in a Greek key configuration, and domain III consists of twoantiparallel beta-sheets in “jelly-roll” formation (de Maagd et al.,2001, supra). Domains II and III are involved in receptor recognitionand binding, and are therefore considered determinants of toxinspecificity.

Amino acid substitutions may be made in nonconserved regions that retainfunction. In general, such substitutions would not be made for conservedamino acid residues, or for amino acid residues residing within aconserved motif, where such residues are essential for protein activity.Examples of residues that are conserved and that may be essential forprotein activity include, for example, residues that are identicalbetween all proteins contained in an alignment of similar or relatedtoxins to the sequences of the invention (e.g., residues that areidentical in an alignment of homologous proteins). Examples of residuesthat are conserved but that may allow conservative amino acidsubstitutions and still retain activity include, for example, residuesthat have only conservative substitutions between all proteins containedin an alignment of similar or related toxins to the sequences of theinvention (e.g., residues that have only conservative substitutionsbetween all proteins contained in the alignment homologous proteins).However, one of skill in the art would understand that functionalvariants may have minor conserved or nonconserved alterations in theconserved residues.

Alternatively, variant nucleotide sequences can be made by introducingmutations randomly along all or part of the coding sequence, such as bysaturation mutagenesis, and the resultant mutants can be screened forability to confer pesticidal activity to identify mutants that retainactivity. Following mutagenesis, the encoded protein can be expressedrecombinantly, and the activity of the protein can be determined usingstandard assay techniques.

Using methods such as PCR, hybridization, and the like correspondingpesticidal sequences can be identified, such sequences havingsubstantial identity to the sequences of the invention (e.g., at leastabout 70%, at least about 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more sequenceidentity across the entirety of the reference sequence) and having orconferring pesticidal activity. See, for example, Sambrook and Russell(2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) and Innis, et al. (1990) PCRProtocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Academic Press, NY).

In a hybridization method, all or part of the pesticidal nucleotidesequence can be used to screen cDNA or genomic libraries. Methods forconstruction of such cDNA and genomic libraries are generally known inthe art and are disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra. Theso-called hybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments, cDNAfragments, RNA fragments, or other oligonucleotides, and may be labeledwith a detectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectable marker,such as other radioisotopes, a fluorescent compound, an enzyme, or anenzyme co-factor. Probes for hybridization can be made by labelingsynthetic oligonucleotides based on the known pesticidalprotein-encoding nucleotide sequence disclosed herein. Degenerateprimers designed on the basis of conserved nucleotides or amino acidresidues in the nucleotide sequence or encoded amino acid sequence canadditionally be used. The probe typically comprises a region ofnucleotide sequence that hybridizes under stringent conditions to atleast about 12, at least about 25, at least about 50, 75, 100, 125, 150,175, or 200 consecutive nucleotides of nucleotide sequence encoding apesticidal protein of the invention or a fragment or variant thereof.Methods for the preparation of probes for hybridization are generallyknown in the art and are disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supraherein incorporated by reference.

For example, an entire pesticidal sequence disclosed herein, or one ormore portions thereof, may be used as a probe capable of specificallyhybridizing to corresponding pesticidal protein-like sequences andmessenger RNAs. To achieve specific hybridization under a variety ofconditions, such probes include sequences that are unique and arepreferably at least about 10 nucleotides in length, or at least about 20nucleotides in length. Such probes may be used to amplify correspondingpesticidal sequences from a chosen organism or sample by PCR. Thistechnique may be used to isolate additional coding sequences from adesired organism or as a diagnostic assay to determine the presence ofcoding sequences in an organism. Hybridization techniques includehybridization screening of plated DNA libraries (either plaques orcolonies; see, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ColdSpring Harbor, N.Y.).

Thus, the present invention encompasses probes for hybridization, aswell as nucleotide sequences capable of hybridization to all or aportion of a nucleotide sequence of the invention (e.g., at least about300 nucleotides, at least about 400, at least about 500, 1000, 1200,1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, or up to the full length of a nucleotidesequence disclosed herein). Hybridization of such sequences may becarried out under stringent conditions. By “stringent conditions” or“stringent hybridization conditions” is intended conditions under whicha probe will hybridize to its target sequence to a detectably greaterdegree than to other sequences (e.g., at least 2-fold over background).Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and will be different indifferent circumstances. By controlling the stringency of thehybridization and/or washing conditions, target sequences that are 100%complementary to the probe can be identified (homologous probing).Alternatively, stringency conditions can be adjusted to allow somemismatching in sequences so that lower degrees of similarity aredetected (heterologous probing). Generally, a probe is less than about1000 nucleotides in length, preferably less than 500 nucleotides inlength.

Typically, stringent conditions will be those in which the saltconcentration is less than about 1.5 M Na ion, typically about 0.01 to1.0 M Na ion concentration (or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and thetemperature is at least about 30° C. for short probes (e.g., 10 to 50nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for long probes (e.g., greaterthan 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with theaddition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. Exemplary lowstringency conditions include hybridization with a buffer solution of 30to 35% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) at 37° C.,and a wash in 1× to 2×SSC (20×SSC=3.0 M NaCl/0.3 M trisodium citrate) at50 to 55° C. Exemplary moderate stringency conditions includehybridization in 40 to 45% formamide, 1.0 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., anda wash in 0.5× to 1×SSC at 55 to 60° C. Exemplary high stringencyconditions include hybridization in 50% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at37° C., and a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Optionally, wash buffersmay comprise about 0.1% to about 1% SDS. Duration of hybridization isgenerally less than about 24 hours, usually about 4 to about 12 hours.

Specificity is typically the function of post-hybridization washes, thecritical factors being the ionic strength and temperature of the finalwash solution. For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated fromthe equation of Meinkoth and Wahl (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284:T_(m)=81.5° C.+16.6 (log M)+0.41 (% GC)−0.61 (% form)−500/L; where M isthe molarity of monovalent cations, % GC is the percentage of guanosineand cytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % form is the percentage offormamide in the hybridization solution, and L is the length of thehybrid in base pairs. The T_(m) is the temperature (under defined ionicstrength and pH) at which 50% of a complementary target sequencehybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C.for each 1% of mismatching; thus, T_(m), hybridization, and/or washconditions can be adjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desiredidentity. For example, if sequences with >90% identity are sought, theT_(m) can be decreased 10° C. Generally, stringent conditions areselected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m))for the specific sequence and its complement at a defined ionic strengthand pH. However, severely stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 1, 2, 3, or 4° C. lower than the thermalmelting point (T_(m)); moderately stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10° C. lower than thethermal melting point (T_(m)); low stringency conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 20° C. lower thanthe thermal melting point (T_(m)). Using the equation, hybridization andwash compositions, and desired T_(m), those of ordinary skill willunderstand that variations in the stringency of hybridization and/orwash solutions are inherently described. If the desired degree ofmismatching results in a T_(m) of less than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or32° C. (formamide solution), it is preferred to increase the SSCconcentration so that a higher temperature can be used. An extensiveguide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen (1993)Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and MolecularBiology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, Part I, Chapter 2(Elsevier, New York); and Ausubel et al., eds. (1995) Current Protocolsin Molecular Biology, Chapter 2 (Greene Publishing andWiley-Interscience, New York). See Sambrook et al. (1989) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

Isolated Proteins and Variants and Fragments Thereof

Pesticidal proteins are also encompassed within the present invention.By “pesticidal protein” is intended a protein having the amino acidsequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11. Fragments, biologically activeportions, and variants thereof are also provided, and may be used topractice the methods of the present invention. An “isolated protein” ora “recombinant protein” is used to refer to a protein that is not longerin its natural environment, for example in vitro or in a recombinantbacterial or plant host cell. In some embodiments, the recombinantprotein is a variant of SEQ ID NO:2-5, wherein the variant comprises atleast one amino acid substitution, deletion, or insertion relative toSEQ ID NO:2-5.

“Fragments” or “biologically active portions” include polypeptidefragments comprising amino acid sequences sufficiently identical to theamino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11, and that exhibitpesticidal activity. A biologically active portion of a pesticidalprotein can be a polypeptide that is, for example, 10, 25, 50, 100, 150,200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850,900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, or more aminoacids in length. Such biologically active portions can be prepared byrecombinant techniques and evaluated for pesticidal activity. Methodsfor measuring pesticidal activity are well known in the art. See, forexample, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83:2480-2485; Andrewset al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J. ofEconomic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all ofwhich are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. As usedhere, a fragment comprises at least 8 contiguous amino acids of SEQ IDNO:4-11. The invention encompasses other fragments, however, such as anyfragment in the protein greater than about 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 150,200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850,900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350 or more aminoacids in length.

By “variants” is intended proteins or polypeptides having an amino acidsequence that is at least about 60%, 65%, about 70%, 75%, about 80%,85%, about 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identicalto the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11. Variants alsoinclude polypeptides encoded by a nucleic acid molecule that hybridizesto the nucleic acid molecule of SEQ ID NO: 1-3, or a complement thereof,under stringent conditions. Variants include polypeptides that differ inamino acid sequence due to mutagenesis. Variant proteins encompassed bythe present invention are biologically active, that is they continue topossess the desired biological activity of the native protein, that is,retaining pesticidal activity. In some embodiments, the variants haveimproved activity relative to the native protein. Methods for measuringpesticidal activity are well known in the art. See, for example, Czaplaand Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83:2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988)Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which are hereinincorporated by reference in their entirety.

Bacterial genes, such as the axmi genes of this invention, quite oftenpossess multiple methionine initiation codons in proximity to the startof the open reading frame. Often, translation initiation at one or moreof these start codons will lead to generation of a functional protein.These start codons can include ATG codons. However, bacteria such asBacillus sp. also recognize the codon GTG as a start codon, and proteinsthat initiate translation at GTG codons contain a methionine at thefirst amino acid. On rare occasions, translation in bacterial systemscan initiate at a TTG codon, though in this event the TTG encodes amethionine. Furthermore, it is not often determined a priori which ofthese codons are used naturally in the bacterium. Thus, it is understoodthat use of one of the alternate methionine codons may also lead togeneration of pesticidal proteins. These pesticidal proteins areencompassed in the present invention and may be used in the methods ofthe present invention. It will be understood that, when expressed inplants, it will be necessary to alter the alternate start codon to ATGfor proper translation.

In various embodiments of the present invention, pesticidal proteinsinclude amino acid sequences deduced from the full-length nucleotidesequences disclosed herein, and amino acid sequences that are shorterthan the full-length sequences due to the use of an alternate downstreamstart site. Thus, the nucleotide sequence of the invention and/orvectors, host cells, and plants comprising the nucleotide sequence ofthe invention (and methods of making and using the nucleotide sequenceof the invention) may comprise a nucleotide sequence encoding the aminoacid sequence corresponding to SEQ ID NO:5-11.

Antibodies to the polypeptides of the present invention, or to variantsor fragments thereof, are also encompassed. Methods for producingantibodies are well known in the art (see, for example, Harlow and Lane(1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,196,265).

Thus, one aspect of the invention concerns antibodies, single-chainantigen binding molecules, or other proteins that specifically bind toone or more of the protein or peptide molecules of the invention andtheir homologs, fusions or fragments. In a particularly preferredembodiment, the antibody specifically binds to a protein having theamino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11 or a fragment thereof.In another embodiment, the antibody specifically binds to a fusionprotein comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the amino acidsequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11 or a fragment thereof. In variousembodiments, the antibody that specifically binds to the protein of theinvention or a fusion protein comprising the protein of the invention isa non-naturally occurring antibody.

Antibodies of the invention may be used to quantitatively orqualitatively detect the protein or peptide molecules of the invention,or to detect post translational modifications of the proteins. As usedherein, an antibody or peptide is said to “specifically bind” to aprotein or peptide molecule of the invention if such binding is notcompetitively inhibited by the presence of non-related molecules.

The antibodies of the invention may be contained within a kit useful fordetection of the protein or peptide molecules of the invention. Theinvention further comprises a method of detecting the protein or peptidemolecule of the invention (particularly a protein encoded by the aminoacid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:4-11, including variants orfragments thereof that are capable of specifically binding to theantibody of the invention) comprising contacting a sample with theantibody of the invention and determining whether the sample containsthe protein or peptide molecule of the invention. Methods for utilizingantibodies for the detection of a protein or peptide of interest areknown in the art.

Altered or Improved Variants

It is recognized that DNA sequences of a pesticidal protein may bealtered by various methods, and that these alterations may result in DNAsequences encoding proteins with amino acid sequences different thanthat encoded by a pesticidal protein of the present invention. Thisprotein may be altered in various ways including amino acidsubstitutions, deletions, truncations, and insertions of one or moreamino acids of SEQ ID NO:4-11, including up to about 2, about 3, about4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 15,about 20, about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50,about 55, about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85,about 90, about 100, about 105, about 110, about 115, about 120, about125, about 130, about 135, about 140, about 145, about 150, about 155,or more amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions. Methods forsuch manipulations are generally known in the art. For example, aminoacid sequence variants of a pesticidal protein can be prepared bymutations in the DNA. This may also be accomplished by one of severalforms of mutagenesis and/or in directed evolution. In some aspects, thechanges encoded in the amino acid sequence will not substantially affectthe function of the protein. Such variants will possess the desiredpesticidal activity. However, it is understood that the ability of apesticidal protein to confer pesticidal activity may be improved by theuse of such techniques upon the compositions of this invention. Forexample, one may express a pesticidal protein in host cells that exhibithigh rates of base misincorporation during DNA replication, such as XL-1Red (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). After propagation in such strains,one can isolate the DNA (for example by preparing plasmid DNA, or byamplifying by PCR and cloning the resulting PCR fragment into a vector),culture the pesticidal protein mutations in a non-mutagenic strain, andidentify mutated genes with pesticidal activity, for example byperforming an assay to test for pesticidal activity. Generally, theprotein is mixed and used in feeding assays. See, for example Marrone etal. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293. Such assays can includecontacting plants with one or more pests and determining the plant'sability to survive and/or cause the death of the pests. Examples ofmutations that result in increased toxicity are found in Schnepf et al.(1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775-806.

Alternatively, alterations may be made to the protein sequence of manyproteins at the amino or carboxy terminus without substantiallyaffecting activity. This can include insertions, deletions, oralterations introduced by modern molecular methods, such as PCR,including PCR amplifications that alter or extend the protein codingsequence by virtue of inclusion of amino acid encoding sequences in theoligonucleotides utilized in the PCR amplification. Alternatively, theprotein sequences added can include entire protein-coding sequences,such as those used commonly in the art to generate protein fusions. Suchfusion proteins are often used to (1) increase expression of a proteinof interest (2) introduce a binding domain, enzymatic activity, orepitope to facilitate either protein purification, protein detection, orother experimental uses known in the art (3) target secretion ortranslation of a protein to a subcellular organelle, such as theperiplasmic space of Gram-negative bacteria, or the endoplasmicreticulum of eukaryotic cells, the latter of which often results inglycosylation of the protein.

Variant nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the present inventionalso encompass sequences derived from mutagenic and recombinogenicprocedures such as DNA shuffling. With such a procedure, one or moredifferent pesticidal protein coding regions can be used to create a newpesticidal protein possessing the desired properties. In this manner,libraries of recombinant polynucleotides are generated from a populationof related sequence polynucleotides comprising sequence regions thathave substantial sequence identity and can be homologously recombined invitro or in vivo. For example, using this approach, sequence motifsencoding a domain of interest may be shuffled between a pesticidal geneof the invention and other known pesticidal genes to obtain a new genecoding for a protein with an improved property of interest, such as anincreased insecticidal activity. Strategies for such DNA shuffling areknown in the art. See, for example, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 91:10747-10751; Stemmer (1994) Nature 370:389-391; Crameri etal. (1997) Nature Biotech. 15:436-438; Moore et al. (1997) J. Mol. Biol.272:336-347; Zhang et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:4504-4509; Crameri et al. (1998) Nature 391:288-291; and U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,605,793 and 5,837,458.

Domain swapping or shuffling is another mechanism for generating alteredpesticidal proteins. Domains may be swapped between pesticidal proteins,resulting in hybrid or chimeric toxins with improved pesticidal activityor target spectrum. Methods for generating recombinant proteins andtesting them for pesticidal activity are well known in the art (see, forexample, Naimov et al. (2001) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5328-5330; deMaagd et al. (1996) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1537-1543; Ge et al.(1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266:17954-17958; Schnepf et al. (1990) J. Biol.Chem. 265:20923-20930; Rang et al. 91999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65:2918-2925).

In yet another embodiment, variant nucleotide and/or amino acidsequences can be obtained using one or more of error-prone PCR,oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, assembly PCR, sexual PCRmutagenesis, in vivo mutagenesis, cassette mutagenesis, recursiveensemble mutagenesis, exponential ensemble mutagenesis, site-specificmutagenesis, gene reassembly, gene site saturation mutagenesis,permutational mutagenesis, synthetic ligation reassembly (SLR),recombination, recursive sequence recombination, phosphothioate-modifiedDNA mutagenesis, uracil-containing template mutagenesis, gapped duplexmutagenesis, point mismatch repair mutagenesis, repair-deficient hoststrain mutagenesis, chemical mutagenesis, radiogenic mutagenesis,deletion mutagenesis, restriction-selection mutagenesis,restriction-purification mutagenesis, artificial gene synthesis,ensemble mutagenesis, chimeric nucleic acid multimer creation, and thelike.

Vectors

A pesticidal sequence of the invention may be provided in an expressioncassette for expression in a host cell of interest, e.g. a plant cell ora microbe. By “plant expression cassette” is intended a DNA constructthat is capable of resulting in the expression of a protein from an openreading frame in a plant cell. Typically these contain a promoter and acoding sequence. Often, such constructs will also contain a 3′untranslated region. Such constructs may contain a “signal sequence” or“leader sequence” to facilitate co-translational or post-translationaltransport of the peptide to certain intracellular structures such as thechloroplast (or other plastid), endoplasmic reticulum, or Golgiapparatus.

By “signal sequence” is intended a sequence that is known or suspectedto result in cotranslational or post-translational peptide transportacross the cell membrane. In eukaryotes, this typically involvessecretion into the Golgi apparatus, with some resulting glycosylation.Insecticidal toxins of bacteria are often synthesized as protoxins,which are protolytically activated in the gut of the target pest (Chang(1987) Methods Enzymol. 153:507-516). In some embodiments of the presentinvention, the signal sequence is located in the native sequence, or maybe derived from a sequence of the invention. By “leader sequence” isintended any sequence that when translated, results in an amino acidsequence sufficient to trigger co-translational transport of the peptidechain to a subcellular organelle. Thus, this includes leader sequencestargeting transport and/or glycosylation by passage into the endoplasmicreticulum, passage to vacuoles, plastids including chloroplasts,mitochondria, and the like. Thus, further provided herein is apolypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence of the present inventionthat is operably linked to a heterologous leader or signal sequence.

By “plant transformation vector” is intended a DNA molecule that isnecessary for efficient transformation of a plant cell. Such a moleculemay consist of one or more plant expression cassettes, and may beorganized into more than one “vector” DNA molecule. For example, binaryvectors are plant transformation vectors that utilize two non-contiguousDNA vectors to encode all requisite cis- and trans-acting functions fortransformation of plant cells (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000) Trends inPlant Science 5:446-451). “Vector” refers to a nucleic acid constructdesigned for transfer between different host cells. “Expression vector”refers to a vector that has the ability to incorporate, integrate andexpress heterologous DNA sequences or fragments in a foreign cell. Thecassette will include 5′ and/or 3′ regulatory sequences operably linkedto a sequence of the invention. By “operably linked” is intended afunctional linkage between a promoter and a second sequence, wherein thepromoter sequence initiates and mediates transcription of the DNAsequence corresponding to the second sequence. Generally, operablylinked means that the nucleic acid sequences being linked are contiguousand, where necessary to join two protein coding regions, contiguous andin the same reading frame. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequenceis operably linked to a heterologous promoter capable of directingexpression of said nucleotide sequence in a host cell, such as amicrobial host cell or a plant host cell. The cassette may additionallycontain at least one additional gene to be cotransformed into theorganism. Alternatively, the additional gene(s) can be provided onmultiple expression cassettes.

In various embodiments, the nucleotide sequence of the invention isoperably linked to a heterologous promoter capable of directingexpression of the nucleotide sequence in a cell, e.g., in a plant cellor a microbe. “Promoter” refers to a nucleic acid sequence thatfunctions to direct transcription of a downstream coding sequence. Thepromoter together with other transcriptional and translationalregulatory nucleic acid sequences (also termed “control sequences”) arenecessary for the expression of a DNA sequence of interest.

Such an expression cassette is provided with a plurality of restrictionsites for insertion of the pesticidal sequence to be under thetranscriptional regulation of the regulatory regions.

The expression cassette will include in the 5′-3′ direction oftranscription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region(i.e., a promoter), a DNA sequence of the invention, and a translationaland transcriptional termination region (i.e., termination region)functional in plants. The promoter may be native or analogous, orforeign or heterologous, to the plant host and/or to the DNA sequence ofthe invention. Additionally, the promoter may be the natural sequence oralternatively a synthetic sequence. Where the promoter is “native” or“homologous” to the plant host, it is intended that the promoter isfound in the native plant into which the promoter is introduced. Wherethe promoter is “foreign” or “heterologous” to the DNA sequence of theinvention, it is intended that the promoter is not the native ornaturally occurring promoter for the operably linked DNA sequence of theinvention. The promoter may be inducible or constitutive. It may benaturally-occurring, may be composed of portions of variousnaturally-occurring promoters, or may be partially or totally synthetic.Guidance for the design of promoters is provided by studies of promoterstructure, such as that of Harley and Reynolds (1987) Nucleic Acids Res.15:2343-2361. Also, the location of the promoter relative to thetranscription start may be optimized. See, e.g., Roberts et al. (1979)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76:760-764. Many suitable promoters for usein plants are well known in the art.

For instance, suitable constitutive promoters for use in plants include:the promoters from plant viruses, such as the peanut chlorotic streakcaulimovirus (PClSV) promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,019); the 35Spromoter from cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) (Odell et al. (1985)Nature 313:810-812); promoters of Chlorella virus methyltransferasegenes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,328) and the full-length transcript promoterfrom figwort mosaic virus (FMV) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619); the promotersfrom such genes as rice actin (McElroy et al. (1990) Plant Cell2:163-171 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876); ubiquitin (Christensen et al.(1989) Plant Mol. Biol. 12:619-632 and Christensen et al. (1992) PlantMol. Biol. 18:675-689); pEMU (Last et al. (1991) Theor. Appl. Genet.81:581-588); MAS (Velten et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3:2723-2730 and U.S. Pat.No. 5,510,474); maize H3 histone (Lepetit et al. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet.231:276-285 and Atanassova et al. (1992) Plant J. 2(3):291-300);Brassica napus ALS3 (PCT application WO97/41228); a plantribulose-biscarboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) small subunit gene; thecircovirus (AU 689 311) or the Cassava vein mosaic virus (CsVMV, U.S.Pat. No. 7,053,205); and promoters of various Agrobacterium genes (seeU.S. Pat. Nos. 4,771,002; 5,102,796; 5,182,200; and 5,428,147).

Suitable inducible promoters for use in plants include: the promoterfrom the ACE1 system which responds to copper (Mett et al. (1993) PNAS90:4567-4571); the promoter of the maize In2 gene which responds tobenzenesulfonamide herbicide safeners (Hershey et al. (1991) Mol. Gen.Genetics 227:229-237 and Gatz et al. (1994) Mol. Gen. Genetics243:32-38); and the promoter of the Tet repressor from Tn10 (Gatz et al.(1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 227:229-237). Another inducible promoter for usein plants is one that responds to an inducing agent to which plants donot normally respond. An exemplary inducible promoter of this type isthe inducible promoter from a steroid hormone gene, the transcriptionalactivity of which is induced by a glucocorticosteroid hormone (Schena etal. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10421) or the recentapplication of a chimeric transcription activator, XVE, for use in anestrogen receptor-based inducible plant expression system activated byestradiol (Zuo et al. (2000) Plant J., 24:265-273). Other induciblepromoters for use in plants are described in EP 332104, PCT WO 93/21334and PCT WO 97/06269 which are herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety. Promoters composed of portions of other promoters andpartially or totally synthetic promoters can also be used. See, e.g., Niet al. (1995) Plant J. 7:661-676 and PCT WO 95/14098 describing suchpromoters for use in plants.

In one embodiment of this invention, a promoter sequence specific forparticular regions or tissues of plants can be used to express thepesticidal proteins of the invention, such as promoters specific forseeds (Datla, R. et al., 1997, Biotechnology Ann. Rev. 3, 269-296),especially the napin promoter (EP 255 378 A1), the phaseolin promoter,the glutenin promoter, the helianthinin promoter (WO92/17580), thealbumin promoter (WO98/45460), the oleosin promoter (WO98/45461), theSAT1 promoter or the SAT3 promoter (PCT/US98/06978).

Use may also be made of an inducible promoter advantageously chosen fromthe phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), HMG-CoA reductase (HMG),chitinase, glucanase, proteinase inhibitor (PI), PR1 family gene,nopaline synthase (nos) and vspB promoters (U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,349,Table 3), the HMG2 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,349), the applebeta-galactosidase (ABG1) promoter and the apple aminocyclopropanecarboxylate synthase (ACC synthase) promoter (WO98/45445). Multiplepromoters can be used in the constructs of the invention, including insuccession.

The promoter may include, or be modified to include, one or moreenhancer elements. In some embodiments, the promoter may include aplurality of enhancer elements. Promoters containing enhancer elementsprovide for higher levels of transcription as compared to promoters thatdo not include them. Suitable enhancer elements for use in plantsinclude the PClSV enhancer element (U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,019), the CaMV35S enhancer element (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,106,739 and 5,164,316) and theFMV enhancer element (Maiti et al. (1997) Transgenic Res. 6:143-156);the translation activator of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) described inApplication WO87/07644, or of the tobacco etch virus (TEV) described byCarrington & Freed 1990, J. Virol. 64: 1590-1597, for example, orintrons such as the adh1 intron of maize or intron 1 of rice actin. Seealso PCT WO96/23898, WO2012/021794, WO2012/021797, WO2011/084370, andWO2011/028914.

Often, such constructs can contain 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions. Suchconstructs may contain a “signal sequence” or “leader sequence” tofacilitate co-translational or post-translational transport of thepeptide of interest to certain intracellular structures such as thechloroplast (or other plastid), endoplasmic reticulum, or Golgiapparatus, or to be secreted. For example, the construct can beengineered to contain a signal peptide to facilitate transfer of thepeptide to the endoplasmic reticulum. By “signal sequence” is intended asequence that is known or suspected to result in cotranslational orpost-translational peptide transport across the cell membrane. Ineukaryotes, this typically involves secretion into the Golgi apparatus,with some resulting glycosylation. By “leader sequence” is intended anysequence that, when translated, results in an amino acid sequencesufficient to trigger co-translational transport of the peptide chain toa sub-cellular organelle. Thus, this includes leader sequences targetingtransport and/or glycosylation by passage into the endoplasmicreticulum, passage to vacuoles, plastids including chloroplasts,mitochondria, and the like. It may also be preferable to engineer theplant expression cassette to contain an intron, such that mRNAprocessing of the intron is required for expression.

By “3′ untranslated region” is intended a polynucleotide locateddownstream of a coding sequence. Polyadenylation signal sequences andother sequences encoding regulatory signals capable of affecting theaddition of polyadenylic acid tracts to the 3′ end of the mRNA precursorare 3′ untranslated regions. By “5′ untranslated region” is intended apolynucleotide located upstream of a coding sequence.

Other upstream or downstream untranslated elements include enhancers.Enhancers are polynucleotides that act to increase the expression of apromoter region. Enhancers are well known in the art and include, butare not limited to, the SV40 enhancer region and the 35S enhancerelement.

The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiationregion, may be native with the operably linked DNA sequence of interest,may be native with the plant host, or may be derived from another source(i.e., foreign or heterologous to the promoter, the DNA sequence ofinterest, the plant host, or any combination thereof). Convenienttermination regions are available from the Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens,such as the octopine synthase and nopaline synthase termination regions.See also Guerineau et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:141-144; Proudfoot(1991) Cell 64:671-674; Sanfacon et al. (1991) Genes Dev. 5:141-149;Mogen et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:1261-1272; Munroe et al. (1990) Gene91:151-158; Ballas et al. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7891-7903; andJoshi et al. (1987) Nucleic Acid Res. 15:9627-9639.

Where appropriate, the gene(s) may be optimized for increased expressionin the transformed host cell (synthetic DNA sequence). That is, thegenes can be synthesized using host cell-preferred codons for improvedexpression, or may be synthesized using codons at a host-preferred codonusage frequency. Expression of the open reading frame of the syntheticDNA sequence in a cell results in production of the polypeptide of theinvention. Synthetic DNA sequences can be useful to simply removeunwanted restriction endonuclease sites, to facilitate DNA cloningstrategies, to alter or remove any potential codon bias, to alter orimprove GC content, to remove or alter alternate reading frames, and/orto alter or remove intron/exon splice recognition sites, polyadenylationsites, Shine-Delgarno sequences, unwanted promoter elements and the likethat may be present in a native DNA sequence. Generally, the GC contentof the gene will be increased. See, for example, Campbell and Gowri(1990) Plant Physiol. 92:1-11 for a discussion of host-preferred codonusage. Methods are available in the art for synthesizing plant-preferredgenes. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,380,831, and 5,436,391, U.S.Patent Publication No. 20090137409, and Murray et al. (1989) NucleicAcids Res. 17:477-498, herein incorporated by reference.

It is also possible that synthetic DNA sequences may be utilized tointroduce other improvements to a DNA sequence, such as introduction ofan intron sequence, creation of a DNA sequence that in expressed as aprotein fusion to organelle targeting sequences, such as chloroplasttransit peptides, apoplast/vacuolar targeting peptides, or peptidesequences that result in retention of the resulting peptide in theendoplasmic reticulum. Thus, in one embodiment, the pesticidal proteinis targeted to the chloroplast for expression. In this manner, where thepesticidal protein is not directly inserted into the chloroplast, theexpression cassette will additionally contain a nucleic acid encoding atransit peptide to direct the pesticidal protein to the chloroplasts.Such transit peptides are known in the art. See, for example, Von Heijneet al. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:104-126; Clark et al. (1989) J.Biol. Chem. 264:17544-17550; Della-Cioppa et al. (1987) Plant Physiol.84:965-968; Romer et al. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.196:1414-1421; and Shah et al. (1986) Science 233:478-481.

The pesticidal gene to be targeted to the chloroplast may be optimizedfor expression in the chloroplast to account for differences in codonusage between the plant nucleus and this organelle. In this manner, thenucleic acids of interest may be synthesized using chloroplast-preferredcodons. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,831, herein incorporatedby reference.

Plant Transformation

Methods of the invention involve introducing a nucleotide construct intoa plant. By “introducing” is intended to present to the plant thenucleotide construct in such a manner that the construct gains access tothe interior of a cell of the plant. The methods of the invention do notrequire that a particular method for introducing a nucleotide constructto a plant is used, only that the nucleotide construct gains access tothe interior of at least one cell of the plant. Methods for introducingnucleotide constructs into plants are known in the art including, butnot limited to, stable transformation methods, transient transformationmethods, and virus-mediated methods.

By “plant” is intended whole plants, plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems,roots, etc.), seeds, plant cells, propagules, embryos and progeny of thesame. Plant cells can be differentiated or undifferentiated (e.g.callus, suspension culture cells, protoplasts, leaf cells, root cells,phloem cells, pollen).

“Transgenic plants” or “transformed plants” or “stably transformed”plants or cells or tissues refers to plants that have incorporated orintegrated exogenous nucleic acid sequences or DNA fragments into theplant cell. These nucleic acid sequences include those that areexogenous, or not present in the untransformed plant cell, as well asthose that may be endogenous, or present in the untransformed plantcell. “Heterologous” generally refers to the nucleic acid sequences thatare not endogenous to the cell or part of the native genome in whichthey are present, and have been added to the cell by infection,transfection, microinjection, electroporation, microprojection, or thelike.

The transgenic plants of the invention express one or more of the noveltoxin sequences disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the protein ornucleotide sequence of the invention is advantageously combined inplants with other genes which encode proteins or RNAs that confer usefulagronomic properties to such plants. Among the genes which encodeproteins or RNAs that confer useful agronomic properties on thetransformed plants, mention can be made of the DNA sequences encodingproteins which confer tolerance to one or more herbicides, and otherswhich confer tolerance to certain insects, those which confer toleranceto certain diseases, DNAs that encodes RNAs that provide nematode orinsect control, and the like. Such genes are in particular described inpublished PCT Patent Applications WO91/02071 and WO95/06128 and in U.S.Pat. No. 7,923,602 and US Patent Application Publication No.20100166723, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in itsentirety.

Among the DNA sequences encoding proteins which confer tolerance tocertain herbicides on the transformed plant cells and plants, mentioncan be made of a bar or PAT gene or the Streptomyces coelicolor genedescribed in WO2009/152359 which confers tolerance to glufosinateherbicides, a gene encoding a suitable EPSPS which confers tolerance toherbicides having EPSPS as a target, such as glyphosate and its salts(U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,060, U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,061, U.S. Pat. No.5,094,945, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,835, U.S. Pat. No. 5,188,642, U.S. Pat.No. 4,971,908, U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,783, U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,667, U.S.Pat. No. 5,312,910, U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061, U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435), agene encoding glyphosate-n-acetyltransferase (for example, U.S. Pat. No.8,222,489, U.S. Pat. No. 8,088,972, U.S. Pat. No. 8,044,261, U.S. Pat.No. 8,021,857, U.S. Pat. No. 8,008,547, U.S. Pat. No. 7,999,152, U.S.Pat. No. 7,998,703, U.S. Pat. No. 7,863,503, U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,188,U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,702, U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,644, U.S. Pat. No.7,666,643, U.S. Pat. No. 7,531,339, U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,955, and U.S.Pat. No. 7,405,074), a gene encoding glyphosate oxydoreductase (forexample, U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175), or a gene encoding an HPPDinhibitor-tolerant protein (for example, the HPPD inhibitor tolerancegenes described in WO 2004/055191, WO 199638567, U.S. Pat. No.6,791,014, WO2011/068567, WO2011/076345, WO2011/085221, WO2011/094205,WO2011/068567, WO2011/094199, WO2011/094205, WO2011/145015,WO2012/056401, and WO2014/043435).

Among the DNA sequences encoding a suitable EPSPS which confer toleranceto the herbicides which have EPSPS as a target, mention will moreparticularly be made of the gene which encodes a plant EPSPS, inparticular maize EPSPS, particularly a maize EPSPS which comprises twomutations, particularly a mutation at amino acid position 102 and amutation at amino acid position 106 (WO2004/074443), and which isdescribed in patent application U.S. Pat. No. 6,566,587, hereinafternamed double mutant maize EPSPS or 2mEPSPS, or the gene which encodes anEPSPS isolated from Agrobacterium and which is described by sequence IDNo. 2 and sequence ID No. 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435, also named CP4.

Among the DNA sequences encoding a suitable EPSPS which confer toleranceto the herbicides which have EPSPS as a target, mention will moreparticularly be made of the gene which encodes an EPSPS GRG23 fromArthrobacter globiformis, but also the mutants GRG23 ACE1, GRG23 ACE2,or GRG23 ACE3, particularly the mutants or variants of GRG23 asdescribed in WO2008/100353, such as GRG23(ace3)R173K of SEQ ID No. 29 inWO2008/100353.

In the case of the DNA sequences encoding EPSPS, and more particularlyencoding the above genes, the sequence encoding these enzymes isadvantageously preceded by a sequence encoding a transit peptide, inparticular the “optimized transit peptide” described in U.S. Pat. No.5,510,471 or 5,633,448.

Exemplary herbicide tolerance traits that can be combined with thenucleic acid sequence of the invention further include at least one ALS(acetolactate synthase) inhibitor (WO2007/024782); a mutated ArabidopsisALS/AHAS gene (U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,533); genes encoding2,4-D-monooxygenases conferring tolerance to 2,4-D(2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) by metabolization (U.S. Pat. No.6,153,401); and, genes encoding Dicamba monooxygenases conferringtolerance to dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) bymetabolization (US 2008/0119361 and US 2008/0120739).

In various embodiments, the nucleic acid of the invention is stackedwith one or more herbicide tolerant genes, including one or more HPPDinhibitor herbicide tolerant genes, and/or one or more genes tolerant toglyphosate and/or glufosinate.

Among the DNA sequences encoding proteins concerning properties oftolerance to insects, mention will more particularly be made of the Btproteins widely described in the literature and well known to thoseskilled in the art. Mention will also be made of proteins extracted frombacteria such as Photorhabdus (WO97/17432 & WO98/08932).

Among such DNA sequences encoding proteins of interest which confernovel properties of tolerance to insects, mention will more particularlybe made of the Bt Cry or VIP proteins widely described in the literatureand well known to those skilled in the art. These include the Cry1Fprotein or hybrids derived from a Cry1F protein (e.g., the hybridCry1A-Cry1F proteins described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,326,169; U.S. Pat. No.6,281,016; U.S. Pat. No. 6,218,188, or toxic fragments thereof), theCry1A-type proteins or toxic fragments thereof, preferably the Cry1Acprotein or hybrids derived from the Cry1Ac protein (e.g., the hybridCry1Ab-Cry1Ac protein described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,275) or theCry1Ab or Bt2 protein or insecticidal fragments thereof as described inEP451878, the Cry2Ae, Cry2Af or Cry2Ag proteins as described inWO2002/057664 or toxic fragments thereof, the Cry1A.105 proteindescribed in WO 2007/140256 (SEQ ID No. 7) or a toxic fragment thereof,the VIP3Aa19 protein of NCBI accession ABG20428, the VIP3Aa20 protein ofNCBI accession ABG20429 (SEQ ID No. 2 in WO 2007/142840), the VIP3Aproteins produced in the COT202 or COT203 cotton events (WO2005/054479and WO2005/054480, respectively), the Cry proteins as described inWO2001/47952, the VIP3Aa protein or a toxic fragment thereof asdescribed in Estruch et al. (1996), Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 28;93(11):5389-94 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,156, the insecticidal proteinsfrom Xenorhabdus (as described in WO98/50427), Serratia (particularlyfrom S. entomophila) or Photorhabdus species strains, such asTc-proteins from Photorhabdus as described in WO98/08932 (e.g.,Waterfield et al., 2001, Appl Environ Microbiol. 67(11):5017-24;Ffrench-Constant and Bowen, 2000, Cell Mol Life Sci.; 57(5):828-33).Also any variants or mutants of any one of these proteins differing insome (1-10, preferably 1-5) amino acids from any of the above sequences,particularly the sequence of their toxic fragment, or which are fused toa transit peptide, such as a plastid transit peptide, or another proteinor peptide, is included herein.

In various embodiments, the nucleic acid of the invention can becombined in plants with one or more genes conferring a desirable trait,such as herbicide tolerance, insect tolerance, drought tolerance,nematode control, water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency,improved nutritional value, disease resistance, improved photosynthesis,improved fiber quality, stress tolerance, improved reproduction, and thelike.

Particularly useful transgenic events which may be combined with thegenes of the current invention in plants of the same species (e.g., bycrossing or by re-transforming a plant containing another transgenicevent with a chimeric gene of the invention), include Event531/PV-GHBK04 (cotton, insect control, described in WO2002/040677),Event 1143-14A (cotton, insect control, not deposited, described inWO2006/128569); Event 1143-51B (cotton, insect control, not deposited,described in WO2006/128570); Event 1445 (cotton, herbicide tolerance,not deposited, described in US-A 2002-120964 or WO2002/034946Event 17053(rice, herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-9843, described inWO2010/117737); Event 17314 (rice, herbicide tolerance, deposited asPTA-9844, described in WO2010/117735); Event 281-24-236 (cotton, insectcontrol—herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-6233, described inWO2005/103266 or US-A 2005-216969); Event 3006-210-23 (cotton, insectcontrol—herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-6233, described in US-A2007-143876 or WO2005/103266); Event 3272 (corn, quality trait,deposited as PTA-9972, described in WO2006/098952 or US-A 2006-230473);Event 33391 (wheat, herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-2347,described in WO2002/027004), Event 40416 (corn, insect control—herbicidetolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-11508, described in WO 11/075593);Event 43A47 (corn, insect control—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCCPTA-11509, described in WO2011/075595); Event 5307 (corn, insectcontrol, deposited as ATCC PTA-9561, described in WO2010/077816); EventASR-368 (bent grass, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-4816,described in US-A 2006-162007 or WO2004/053062); Event B16 (corn,herbicide tolerance, not deposited, described in US-A 2003-126634);Event BPS-CV127-9 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited as NCIMB No.41603, described in WO2010/080829); Event BLR1 (oilseed rape,restoration of male sterility, deposited as NCIMB 41193, described inWO2005/074671), Event CE43-67B (cotton, insect control, deposited as DSMACC2724, described in US-A 2009-217423 or WO2006/128573); Event CE44-69D(cotton, insect control, not deposited, described in US-A 2010-0024077);Event CE44-69D (cotton, insect control, not deposited, described inWO2006/128571); Event CE46-02A (cotton, insect control, not deposited,described in WO2006/128572); Event COT102 (cotton, insect control, notdeposited, described in US-A 2006-130175 or WO2004/039986); Event COT202(cotton, insect control, not deposited, described in US-A 2007-067868 orWO2005/054479); Event COT203 (cotton, insect control, not deposited,described in WO2005/054480); Event DAS21606-3/1606 (soybean, herbicidetolerance, deposited as PTA-11028, described in WO2012/033794), EventDAS40278 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-10244,described in WO2011/022469); Event DAS-44406-6/pDAB8264.44.06.1(soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-11336, described inWO2012/075426), Event DAS-14536-7/pDAB8291.45.36.2 (soybean, herbicidetolerance, deposited as PTA-11335, described in WO2012/075429), EventDAS-59122-7 (corn, insect control—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCCPTA 11384, described in US-A 2006-070139); Event DAS-59132 (corn, insectcontrol—herbicide tolerance, not deposited, described in WO2009/100188);Event DAS68416 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCCPTA-10442, described in WO2011/066384 or WO2011/066360); EventDP-098140-6 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-8296,described in US-A 2009-137395 or WO 08/112019); Event DP-305423-1(soybean, quality trait, not deposited, described in US-A 2008-312082 orWO2008/054747); Event DP-32138-1 (corn, hybridization system, depositedas ATCC PTA-9158, described in US-A 2009-0210970 or WO2009/103049);Event DP-356043-5 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCCPTA-8287, described in US-A 2010-0184079 or WO2008/002872); Event EE-1(brinjal, insect control, not deposited, described in WO 07/091277);Event FI117 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC 209031,described in US-A 2006-059581 or WO 98/044140); Event FG72 (soybean,herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-11041, described inWO2011/063413), Event GA21 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC209033, described in US-A 2005-086719 or WO 98/044140); Event GG25(corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC 209032, described in US-A2005-188434 or WO 98/044140); Event GHB119 (cotton, insectcontrol—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-8398, described inWO2008/151780); Event GHB614 (cotton, herbicide tolerance, deposited asATCC PTA-6878, described in US-A 2010-050282 or WO2007/017186); EventGJ11 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC 209030, described inUS-A 2005-188434 or WO98/044140); Event GM RZ13 (sugar beet, virusresistance, deposited as NCIMB-41601, described in WO2010/076212); EventH7-1 (sugar beet, herbicide tolerance, deposited as NCIMB 41158 or NCIMB41159, described in US-A 2004-172669 or WO 2004/074492); Event JOPLIN1(wheat, disease tolerance, not deposited, described in US-A2008-064032); Event LL27 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited asNCIMB41658, described in WO2006/108674 or US-A 2008-320616); Event LL55(soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited as NCIMB 41660, described in WO2006/108675 or US-A 2008-196127); Event LLcotton25 (cotton, herbicidetolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-3343, described in WO2003/013224 orUS-A 2003-097687); Event LLRICE06 (rice, herbicide tolerance, depositedas ATCC 203353, described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,468,747 or WO2000/026345);Event LLRice62 (rice, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC 203352,described in WO2000/026345), Event LLRICE601 (rice, herbicide tolerance,deposited as ATCC PTA-2600, described in US-A 2008-2289060 orWO2000/026356); Event LY038 (corn, quality trait, deposited as ATCCPTA-5623, described in US-A 2007-028322 or WO2005/061720); Event MIR162(corn, insect control, deposited as PTA-8166, described in US-A2009-300784 or WO2007/142840); Event MIR604 (corn, insect control, notdeposited, described in US-A 2008-167456 or WO2005/103301); EventMON15985 (cotton, insect control, deposited as ATCC PTA-2516, describedin US-A 2004-250317 or WO2002/100163); Event MON810 (corn, insectcontrol, not deposited, described in US-A 2002-102582); Event MON863(corn, insect control, deposited as ATCC PTA-2605, described inWO2004/011601 or US-A 2006-095986); Event MON87427 (corn, pollinationcontrol, deposited as ATCC PTA-7899, described in WO2011/062904); EventMON87460 (corn, stress tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-8910, describedin WO2009/111263 or US-A 2011-0138504); Event MON87701 (soybean, insectcontrol, deposited as ATCC PTA-8194, described in US-A 2009-130071 orWO2009/064652); Event MON87705 (soybean, quality trait—herbicidetolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-9241, described in US-A 2010-0080887 orWO2010/037016); Event MON87708 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, depositedas ATCC PTA-9670, described in WO2011/034704); Event MON87712 (soybean,yield, deposited as PTA-10296, described in WO2012/051199), EventMON87754 (soybean, quality trait, deposited as ATCC PTA-9385, describedin WO2010/024976); Event MON87769 (soybean, quality trait, deposited asATCC PTA-8911, described in US-A 2011-0067141 or WO2009/102873); EventMON88017 (corn, insect control—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCCPTA-5582, described in US-A 2008-028482 or WO2005/059103); EventMON88913 (cotton, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-4854,described in WO2004/072235 or US-A 2006-059590); Event MON88302 (oilseedrape, herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-10955, described inWO2011/153186), Event MON88701 (cotton, herbicide tolerance, depositedas PTA-11754, described in WO2012/134808), Event MON89034 (corn, insectcontrol, deposited as ATCC PTA-7455, described in WO 07/140256 or US-A2008-260932); Event MON89788 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, deposited asATCC PTA-6708, described in US-A 2006-282915 or WO2006/130436); EventMS11 (oilseed rape, pollination control—herbicide tolerance, depositedas ATCC PTA-850 or PTA-2485, described in WO2001/031042); Event MS8(oilseed rape, pollination control—herbicide tolerance, deposited asATCC PTA-730, described in WO2001/041558 or US-A 2003-188347); EventNK603 (corn, herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-2478, describedin US-A 2007-292854); Event PE-7 (rice, insect control, not deposited,described in WO2008/114282); Event RF3 (oilseed rape, pollinationcontrol—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-730, described inWO2001/041558 or US-A 2003-188347); Event RT73 (oilseed rape, herbicidetolerance, not deposited, described in WO2002/036831 or US-A2008-070260); Event SYHTOH2/SYN-000H2-5 (soybean, herbicide tolerance,deposited as PTA-11226, described in WO2012/082548), Event T227-1 (sugarbeet, herbicide tolerance, not deposited, described in WO2002/44407 orUS-A 2009-265817); Event T25 (corn, herbicide tolerance, not deposited,described in US-A 2001-029014 or WO2001/051654); Event T304-40 (cotton,insect control—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-8171,described in US-A 2010-077501 or WO2008/122406); Event T342-142 (cotton,insect control, not deposited, described in WO2006/128568); Event TC1507(corn, insect control—herbicide tolerance, not deposited, described inUS-A 2005-039226 or WO2004/099447); Event VIP1034 (corn, insectcontrol—herbicide tolerance, deposited as ATCC PTA-3925, described inWO2003/052073), Event 32316 (corn, insect control-herbicide tolerance,deposited as PTA-11507, described in WO2011/084632), Event 4114 (corn,insect control-herbicide tolerance, deposited as PTA-11506, described inWO2011/084621), event EE-GM3/FG72 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, ATCCAccession No PTA-11041) optionally stacked with event EE-GM1/LL27 orevent EE-GM2/LL55 (WO2011/063413A2), event DAS-68416-4 (soybean,herbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession No PTA-10442, WO2011/066360A1),event DAS-68416-4 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession NoPTA-10442, WO2011/066384A1), event DP-040416-8 (corn, insect control,ATCC Accession No PTA-11508, WO2011/075593A1), event DP-043A47-3 (corn,insect control, ATCC Accession No PTA-11509, WO2011/075595A1), eventDP-004114-3 (corn, insect control, ATCC Accession No PTA-11506,WO2011/084621A1), event DP-032316-8 (corn, insect control, ATCCAccession No PTA-11507, WO2011/084632A1), event MON-88302-9 (oilseedrape, herbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession No PTA-10955,WO2011/153186A1), event DAS-21606-3 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, ATCCAccession No. PTA-11028, WO2012/033794A2), event MON-87712-4 (soybean,quality trait, ATCC Accession No. PTA-10296, WO2012/051199A2), eventDAS-44406-6 (soybean, stacked herbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession No.PTA-11336, WO2012/075426A1), event DAS-14536-7 (soybean, stackedherbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession No. PTA-11335, WO2012/075429A1),event SYN-000H2-5 (soybean, herbicide tolerance, ATCC Accession N°.PTA-11226, WO2012/082548A2), event DP-061061-7 (oilseed rape, herbicidetolerance, no deposit No available, WO2012071039A1), event DP-073496-4(oilseed rape, herbicide tolerance, no deposit No available,US2012131692), event 8264.44.06.1 (soybean, stacked herbicide tolerance,Accession No PTA-11336, WO2012075426A2), event 8291.45.36.2 (soybean,stacked herbicide tolerance, Accession No. PTA-11335, WO2012075429A2),event SYHTOH2 (soybean, ATCC Accession No. PTA-11226, WO2012/082548A2),event MON88701 (cotton, ATCC Accession No PTA-11754, WO2012/134808A1),event KK179-2 (alfalfa, ATCC Accession No PTA-11833, WO2013/003558A1),event pDAB8264.42.32.1 (soybean, stacked herbicide tolerance, ATCCAccession No PTA-11993, WO2013/010094A1), event MZDT09Y (corn, ATCCAccession No PTA-13025, WO2013/012775A1).

Transformation of plant cells can be accomplished by one of severaltechniques known in the art. The pesticidal gene of the invention may bemodified to obtain or enhance expression in plant cells. Typically aconstruct that expresses such a protein would contain a promoter todrive transcription of the gene, as well as a 3′ untranslated region toallow transcription termination and polyadenylation. The organization ofsuch constructs is well known in the art. In some instances, it may beuseful to engineer the gene such that the resulting peptide is secreted,or otherwise targeted within the plant cell. For example, the gene canbe engineered to contain a signal peptide to facilitate transfer of thepeptide to the endoplasmic reticulum. It may also be preferable toengineer the plant expression cassette to contain an intron, such thatmRNA processing of the intron is required for expression.

Typically this “plant expression cassette” will be inserted into a“plant transformation vector”. This plant transformation vector may becomprised of one or more DNA vectors needed for achieving planttransformation. For example, it is a common practice in the art toutilize plant transformation vectors that are comprised of more than onecontiguous DNA segment. These vectors are often referred to in the artas “binary vectors.” Binary vectors as well as vectors with helperplasmids are most often used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation,where the size and complexity of DNA segments needed to achieveefficient transformation is quite large, and it is advantageous toseparate functions onto separate DNA molecules. Binary vectors typicallycontain a plasmid vector that contains the cis-acting sequences requiredfor T-DNA transfer (such as left border and right border), a selectablemarker that is engineered to be capable of expression in a plant cell,and a “gene of interest” (a gene engineered to be capable of expressionin a plant cell for which generation of transgenic plants is desired).Also present on this plasmid vector are sequences required for bacterialreplication. The cis-acting sequences are arranged in a fashion to allowefficient transfer into plant cells and expression therein. For example,the selectable marker gene and the pesticidal gene are located betweenthe left and right borders. Often a second plasmid vector contains thetrans-acting factors that mediate T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium toplant cells. This plasmid often contains the virulence functions (Virgenes) that allow infection of plant cells by Agrobacterium, andtransfer of DNA by cleavage at border sequences and vir-mediated DNAtransfer, as is understood in the art (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000)Trends in Plant Science 5:446-451). Several types of Agrobacteriumstrains (e.g. LBA4404, GV3101, EHA101, EHA105, etc.) can be used forplant transformation. The second plasmid vector is not necessary fortransforming the plants by other methods such as microprojection,microinjection, electroporation, polyethylene glycol, etc.

In general, plant transformation methods involve transferringheterologous DNA into target plant cells (e.g. immature or matureembryos, suspension cultures, undifferentiated callus, protoplasts,etc.), followed by applying a maximum threshold level of appropriateselection (depending on the selectable marker gene) to recover thetransformed plant cells from a group of untransformed cell mass.Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of the same mediumand cultured routinely. Subsequently, the transformed cells aredifferentiated into shoots after placing on regeneration mediumsupplemented with a maximum threshold level of selecting agent. Theshoots are then transferred to a selective rooting medium for recoveringrooted shoot or plantlet. The transgenic plantlet then grows into amature plant and produces fertile seeds (e.g. Hiei et al. (1994) ThePlant Journal 6:271-282; Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnology14:745-750). Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of thesame medium and cultured routinely. A general description of thetechniques and methods for generating transgenic plants are found inAyres and Park (1994) Critical Reviews in Plant Science 13:219-239 andBommineni and Jauhar (1997) Maydica 42:107-120. Since the transformedmaterial contains many cells; both transformed and non-transformed cellsare present in any piece of subjected target callus or tissue or groupof cells. The ability to kill non-transformed cells and allowtransformed cells to proliferate results in transformed plant cultures.Often, the ability to remove non-transformed cells is a limitation torapid recovery of transformed plant cells and successful generation oftransgenic plants.

Transformation protocols as well as protocols for introducing nucleotidesequences into plants may vary depending on the type of plant or plantcell, i.e., monocot or dicot, targeted for transformation. Generation oftransgenic plants may be performed by one of several methods, including,but not limited to, microinjection, electroporation, direct genetransfer, introduction of heterologous DNA by Agrobacterium into plantcells (Agrobacterium-mediated transformation), bombardment of plantcells with heterologous foreign DNA adhered to particles, ballisticparticle acceleration, aerosol beam transformation (U.S. PublishedApplication No. 20010026941; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050; InternationalPublication No. WO 91/00915; U.S. Published Application No. 2002015066),Lecd transformation, and various other non-particle direct-mediatedmethods to transfer DNA.

Methods for transformation of chloroplasts are known in the art. See,for example, Svab et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8526-8530;Svab and Maliga (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:913-917; Svab andMaliga (1993) EMBO J. 12:601-606. The method relies on particle gundelivery of DNA containing a selectable marker and targeting of the DNAto the plastid genome through homologous recombination. Additionally,plastid transformation can be accomplished by transactivation of asilent plastid-borne transgene by tissue-preferred expression of anuclear-encoded and plastid-directed RNA polymerase. Such a system hasbeen reported in McBride et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:7301-7305.

Following integration of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, onethen applies a maximum threshold level of appropriate selection in themedium to kill the untransformed cells and separate and proliferate theputatively transformed cells that survive from this selection treatmentby transferring regularly to a fresh medium. By continuous passage andchallenge with appropriate selection, one identifies and proliferatesthe cells that are transformed with the plasmid vector. Molecular andbiochemical methods can then be used to confirm the presence of theintegrated heterologous gene of interest into the genome of thetransgenic plant.

The cells that have been transformed may be grown into plants inaccordance with conventional ways. See, for example, McCormick et al.(1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:81-84. These plants may then be grown, andeither pollinated with the same transformed strain or different strains,and the resulting hybrid having constitutive expression of the desiredphenotypic characteristic identified. Two or more generations may begrown to ensure that expression of the desired phenotypic characteristicis stably maintained and inherited and then seeds harvested to ensureexpression of the desired phenotypic characteristic has been achieved.In this manner, the present invention provides transformed seed (alsoreferred to as “transgenic seed”) having a nucleotide construct of theinvention, for example, an expression cassette of the invention, stablyincorporated into their genome.

Evaluation of Plant Transformation

Following introduction of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, thetransformation or integration of heterologous gene in the plant genomeis confirmed by various methods such as analysis of nucleic acids,proteins and metabolites associated with the integrated gene.

PCR analysis is a rapid method to screen transformed cells, tissue orshoots for the presence of incorporated gene at the earlier stage beforetransplanting into the soil (Sambrook and Russell (2001) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ColdSpring Harbor, N.Y.). PCR is carried out using oligonucleotide primersspecific to the gene of interest or Agrobacterium vector background,etc.

Plant transformation may be confirmed by Southern blot analysis ofgenomic DNA (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra). In general, total DNAis extracted from the transformant, digested with appropriaterestriction enzymes, fractionated in an agarose gel and transferred to anitrocellulose or nylon membrane. The membrane or “blot” is then probedwith, for example, radiolabeled ³²P target DNA fragment to confirm theintegration of introduced gene into the plant genome according tostandard techniques (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra).

In Northern blot analysis, RNA is isolated from specific tissues oftransformant, fractionated in a formaldehyde agarose gel, and blottedonto a nylon filter according to standard procedures that are routinelyused in the art (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra). Expression of RNAencoded by the pesticidal gene is then tested by hybridizing the filterto a radioactive probe derived from a pesticidal gene, by methods knownin the art (Sambrook and Russell, 2001, supra).

Western blot, biochemical assays and the like may be carried out on thetransgenic plants to confirm the presence of protein encoded by thepesticidal gene by standard procedures (Sambrook and Russell, 2001,supra) using antibodies that bind to one or more epitopes present on thepesticidal protein.

Pesticidal Activity in Plants

In another aspect of the invention, one may generate transgenic plantsexpressing a pesticidal protein that has pesticidal activity. Methodsdescribed above by way of example may be utilized to generate transgenicplants, but the manner in which the transgenic plant cells are generatedis not critical to this invention. Methods known or described in the artsuch as Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, biolistic transformation,and non-particle-mediated methods may be used at the discretion of theexperimenter. Plants expressing a pesticidal protein may be isolated bycommon methods described in the art, for example by transformation ofcallus, selection of transformed callus, and regeneration of fertileplants from such transgenic callus. In such process, one may use anygene as a selectable marker so long as its expression in plant cellsconfers ability to identify or select for transformed cells.

A number of markers have been developed for use with plant cells, suchas resistance to chloramphenicol, the aminoglycoside G418, hygromycin,or the like. Other genes that encode a product involved in chloroplastmetabolism may also be used as selectable markers. For example, genesthat provide resistance to plant herbicides such as glyphosate,bromoxynil, or imidazolinone may find particular use. Such genes havebeen reported (Stalker et al. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 263:6310-6314(bromoxynil resistance nitrilase gene); and Sathasivan et al. (1990)Nucl. Acids Res. 18:2188 (AHAS imidazolinone resistance gene).Additionally, the genes disclosed herein are useful as markers to assesstransformation of bacterial or plant cells. Methods for detecting thepresence of a transgene in a plant, plant organ (e.g., leaves, stems,roots, etc.), seed, plant cell, propagule, embryo or progeny of the sameare well known in the art. In one embodiment, the presence of thetransgene is detected by testing for pesticidal activity.

Fertile plants expressing a pesticidal protein may be tested forpesticidal activity, and the plants showing optimal activity selectedfor further breeding. Methods are available in the art to assay for pestactivity. Generally, the protein is mixed and used in feeding assays.See, for example Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology78:290-293.

The present invention may be used for transformation of any plantspecies, including, but not limited to, monocots and dicots. Examples ofplants of interest include, but are not limited to, corn (maize),sorghum, wheat, sunflower, tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton,rice, soybean, sugarbeet, sugarcane, tobacco, barley, and oilseed rape,Brassica sp., alfalfa, rye, millet, safflower, peanuts, sweet potato,cassava, coffee, coconut, pineapple, citrus trees, cocoa, tea, banana,avocado, fig, guava, mango, olive, papaya, cashew, macadamia, almond,oats, vegetables, ornamentals, and conifers.

Vegetables include, but are not limited to, tomatoes, lettuce, greenbeans, lima beans, peas, and members of the genus Curcumis such ascucumber, cantaloupe, and musk melon. Ornamentals include, but are notlimited to, azalea, hydrangea, hibiscus, roses, tulips, daffodils,petunias, carnation, poinsettia, and chrysanthemum. Preferably, plantsof the present invention are crop plants (for example, maize, sorghum,wheat, sunflower, tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton, rice,soybean, sugarbeet, sugarcane, tobacco, barley, oilseed rape, etc.).

Use in Pesticidal Control

General methods for employing strains comprising a nucleotide sequenceof the present invention, or a variant thereof, in pest control or inengineering other organisms as pesticidal agents are known in the art.See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,523 and EP 0480762A2.

The Bacillus strains containing a nucleotide sequence of the presentinvention, or a variant thereof, or the microorganisms that have beengenetically altered to contain a pesticidal gene of the invention andprotein may be used for protecting agricultural crops and products frompests. In one aspect of the invention, whole, i.e., unlysed, cells of atoxin (pesticide)-producing organism are treated with reagents thatprolong the activity of the toxin produced in the cell when the cell isapplied to the environment of target pest(s).

Alternatively, the pesticide is produced by introducing a pesticidalgene into a cellular host. Expression of the pesticidal gene results,directly or indirectly, in the intracellular production and maintenanceof the pesticide. In one aspect of this invention, these cells are thentreated under conditions that prolong the activity of the toxin producedin the cell when the cell is applied to the environment of the targetpest(s). The resulting product retains the toxicity of the toxin. Thesenaturally encapsulated pesticides may then be formulated in accordancewith conventional techniques for application to the environment hostinga target pest, e.g., soil, water, and foliage of plants. See, forexample EPA 0192319, and the references cited therein. Alternatively,one may formulate the cells expressing a gene of this invention such asto allow application of the resulting material as a pesticide.

The active ingredients of the present invention are normally applied inthe form of compositions and can be applied to the crop area or plant tobe treated, simultaneously or in succession, with other compounds. Thesecompounds can be fertilizers, weed killers, cryoprotectants,surfactants, detergents, pesticidal soaps, dormant oils, polymers,and/or time-release or biodegradable carrier formulations that permitlong-term dosing of a target area following a single application of theformulation. They can also be selective herbicides, chemicalinsecticides, virucides, microbicides, amoebicides, pesticides,fungicides, bacteriocides, nematocides, molluscicides or mixtures ofseveral of these preparations, if desired, together with furtheragriculturally acceptable carriers, surfactants or application-promotingadjuvants customarily employed in the art of formulation. Suitablecarriers and adjuvants can be solid or liquid and correspond to thesubstances ordinarily employed in formulation technology, e.g. naturalor regenerated mineral substances, solvents, dispersants, wettingagents, tackifiers, binders or fertilizers. Likewise the formulationsmay be prepared into edible “baits” or fashioned into pest “traps” topermit feeding or ingestion by a target pest of the pesticidalformulation.

Methods of applying an active ingredient of the present invention or anagrochemical composition of the present invention that contains at leastone of the pesticidal proteins produced by the bacterial strains of thepresent invention include leaf application, seed coating and soilapplication. The number of applications and the rate of applicationdepend on the intensity of infestation by the corresponding pest.

The composition may be formulated as a powder, dust, pellet, granule,spray, emulsion, colloid, solution, or such like, and may be prepared bysuch conventional means as desiccation, lyophilization, homogenation,extraction, filtration, centrifugation, sedimentation, or concentrationof a culture of cells comprising the polypeptide. In all suchcompositions that contain at least one such pesticidal polypeptide, thepolypeptide may be present in a concentration of from about 1% to about99% by weight.

Lepidopteran, hemipteran, dipteran, or coleopteran pests may be killedor reduced in numbers in a given area by the methods of the invention,or may be prophylactically applied to an environmental area to preventinfestation by a susceptible pest. Preferably the pest ingests, or iscontacted with, a pesticidally-effective amount of the polypeptide. By“pesticidally-effective amount” is intended an amount of the pesticidethat is able to bring about death to at least one pest, or to noticeablyreduce pest growth, feeding, or normal physiological development. Thisamount will vary depending on such factors as, for example, the specifictarget pests to be controlled, the specific environment, location,plant, crop, or agricultural site to be treated, the environmentalconditions, and the method, rate, concentration, stability, and quantityof application of the pesticidally-effective polypeptide composition.The formulations may also vary with respect to climatic conditions,environmental considerations, and/or frequency of application and/orseverity of pest infestation.

The pesticide compositions described may be made by formulating eitherthe bacterial cell, the crystal and/or the spore suspension, or theisolated protein component with the desired agriculturally-acceptablecarrier. The compositions may be formulated prior to administration inan appropriate means such as lyophilized, freeze-dried, desiccated, orin an aqueous carrier, medium or suitable diluent, such as saline orother buffer. The formulated compositions may be in the form of a dustor granular material, or a suspension in oil (vegetable or mineral), orwater or oil/water emulsions, or as a wettable powder, or in combinationwith any other carrier material suitable for agricultural application.Suitable agricultural carriers can be solid or liquid and are well knownin the art. The term “agriculturally-acceptable carrier” covers alladjuvants, inert components, dispersants, surfactants, tackifiers,binders, etc. that are ordinarily used in pesticide formulationtechnology; these are well known to those skilled in pesticideformulation. The formulations may be mixed with one or more solid orliquid adjuvants and prepared by various means, e.g., by homogeneouslymixing, blending and/or grinding the pesticidal composition withsuitable adjuvants using conventional formulation techniques. Suitableformulations and application methods are described in U.S. Pat. No.6,468,523, herein incorporated by reference.

“Pest” includes but is not limited to, insects, fungi, bacteria,nematodes, mites, ticks, and the like. Insect pests include insectsselected from the orders Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera,Mallophaga, Homoptera, Hemiptera, Orthroptera, Thysanoptera, Dermaptera,Isoptera, Anoplura, Siphonaptera, Trichoptera, etc., particularlyColeoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera.

The order Coleoptera includes the suborders Adephaga and Polyphaga.Suborder Adephaga includes the superfamilies Caraboidea and Gyrinoidea,while suborder Polyphaga includes the superfamilies Hydrophiloidea,Staphylinoidea, Cantharoidea, Cleroidea, Elateroidea, Dascilloidea,Dryopoidea, Byrrhoidea, Cucujoidea, Meloidea, Mordelloidea,Tenebrionoidea, Bostrichoidea, Scarabaeoidea, Cerambycoidea,Chrysomeloidea, and Curculionoidea. Superfamily Caraboidea includes thefamilies Cicindelidae, Carabidae, and Dytiscidae. Superfamily Gyrinoideaincludes the family Gyrinidae. Superfamily Hydrophiloidea includes thefamily Hydrophilidae. Superfamily Staphylinoidea includes the familiesSilphidae and Staphylinidae. Superfamily Cantharoidea includes thefamilies Cantharidae and Lampyridae. Superfamily Cleroidea includes thefamilies Cleridae and Dermestidae. Superfamily Elateroidea includes thefamilies Elateridae and Buprestidae.

Superfamily Cucujoidea includes the family Coccinellidae. SuperfamilyMeloidea includes the family Meloidae. Superfamily Tenebrionoideaincludes the family Tenebrionidae. Superfamily Scarabaeoidea includesthe families Passalidae and Scarabaeidae. Superfamily Cerambycoideaincludes the family Cerambycidae. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea includesthe family Chrysomelidae. Superfamily Curculionoidea includes thefamilies Curculionidae and Scolytidae.

The order Diptera includes the Suborders Nematocera, Brachycera, andCyclorrhapha. Suborder Nematocera includes the families Tipulidae,Psychodidae, Culicidae, Ceratopogonidae, Chironomidae, Simuliidae,Bibionidae, and Cecidomyiidae. Suborder Brachycera includes the familiesStratiomyidae, Tabanidae, Therevidae, Asilidae, Mydidae, Bombyliidae,and Dolichopodidae. Suborder Cyclorrhapha includes the Divisions Aschizaand Aschiza. Division Aschiza includes the families Phoridae, Syrphidae,and Conopidae. Division Aschiza includes the Sections Acalyptratae andCalyptratae. Section Acalyptratae includes the families Otitidae,Tephritidae, Agromyzidae, and Drosophilidae. Section Calyptrataeincludes the families Hippoboscidae, Oestridae, Tachinidae,Anthomyiidae, Muscidae, Calliphoridae, and Sarcophagidae.

The order Lepidoptera includes the families Papilionidae, Pieridae,Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae, Danaidae, Satyridae, Hesperiidae, Sphingidae,Saturniidae, Geometridae, Arctiidae, Noctuidae, Lymantriidae, Sesiidae,and Tineidae.

Nematodes include parasitic nematodes such as root-knot, cyst, andlesion nematodes, including Heterodera spp., Meloidogyne spp., andGlobodera spp.; particularly members of the cyst nematodes, including,but not limited to, Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode);Heterodera schachtii (beet cyst nematode); Heterodera avenae (cerealcyst nematode); and Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pailida(potato cyst nematodes). Lesion nematodes include Pratylenchus spp.

Hemipteran pests (which include species that are designated asHemiptera, Homoptera, or Heteroptera) include, but are not limited to,Lygus spp., such as Western tarnished plant bug (Lygus hesperus), thetarnished plant bug (Lygus lineolaris), and green plant bug (Lyguselisus); aphids, such as the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), cottonaphid (Aphis gossypii), cherry aphid or black cherry aphid (Myzuscerasi), soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura); brown plant hopper(Nilaparvata lugens), and rice green leafhopper (Nephotettix spp.); andstink bugs, such as green stink bug (Acrosternum hilare), brownmarmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys), southern green stink bug(Nezara viridula), rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax), forest bug(Pentatoma rufipes), European stink bug (Rhaphigaster nebulosa), and theshield bug Troilus luridus.

Insect pests of the invention for the major crops include: Maize:Ostrinia nubilalis, European corn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm;Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fall armyworm;Diatraea grandiosella, southwestern corn borer; Elasmopalpuslignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Diatraea saccharalis, surgarcaneborer; Diabrotica virgifera, western corn rootworm; Diabroticalongicornis barberi, northern corn rootworm; Diabrotica undecimpunctatahowardi, southern corn rootworm; Melanotus spp., wireworms; Cyclocephalaborealis, northern masked chafer (white grub); Cyclocephala immaculata,southern masked chafer (white grub); Popillia japonica, Japanese beetle;Chaetocnema pulicaria, corn flea beetle; Sphenophorus maidis, maizebillbug; Rhopalosiphum maidis, corn leaf aphid; Anuraphis maidiradicis,corn root aphid; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Melanoplusfemurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplus sanguinipes, migratorygrasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcorn maggot; Agromyza parvicornis,corn blot leafminer; Anaphothrips obscrurus, grass thrips; Solenopsismilesta, thief ant; Tetranychus urticae, twospotted spider mite;Sorghum: Chilo partellus, sorghum borer; Spodoptera frugiperda, fallarmyworm; Spodoptera cosmioides; Spodoptera eridania; Helicoverpa zea,corn earworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Feltiasubterranea, granulate cutworm; Phyllophaga crinita, white grub;Eleodes, Conoderus, and Aeolus spp., wireworms; Oulema melanopus, cerealleaf beetle; Chaetocnema pulicaria, corn flea beetle; Sphenophorusmaidis, maize billbug; Rhopalosiphum maidis; corn leaf aphid; Siphaflava, yellow sugarcane aphid; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinchbug; Contarinia sorghicola, sorghum midge; Tetranychus cinnabarinus,carmine spider mite; Tetranychus urticae, twospotted spider mite; Wheat:Pseudaletia unipunctata, army worm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fallarmyworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Agrotisorthogonia, western cutworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lesser cornstalkborer; Oulema melanopus, cereal leaf beetle; Hypera punctata, cloverleaf weevil; Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi, southern corn rootworm;Russian wheat aphid; Schizaphis graminum, greenbug; Macrosiphum avenae,English grain aphid; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper;Melanoplus differentialis, differential grasshopper; Melanoplussanguinipes, migratory grasshopper; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly;Sitodiplosis mosellana, wheat midge; Meromyza americana, wheat stemmaggot; Hylemya coarctata, wheat bulb fly; Frankliniella fusca, tobaccothrips; Cephus cinctus, wheat stem sawfly; Aceria tulipae, wheat curlmite; Sunflower: Suleima helianthana, sunflower bud moth; Homoeosomaelectellum, sunflower moth; zygogramma exclamationis, sunflower beetle;Bothyrus gibbosus, carrot beetle; Neolasioptera murtfeldtiana, sunflowerseed midge; Cotton: Heliothis virescens, cotton budworm; Helicoverpazea, cotton bollworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm; Pectinophoragossypiella, pink bollworm; Anthonomus grandis, boll weevil; Aphisgossypii, cotton aphid; Pseudatomoscelis seriatus, cotton fleahopper;Trialeurodes abutilonea, bandedwinged whitefly; Lygus lineolaris,tarnished plant bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper;Melanoplus differentialis, differential grasshopper; Thrips tabaci,onion thrips; Franklinkiella fusca, tobacco thrips; Tetranychuscinnabarinus, carmine spider mite; Tetranychus urticae, twospottedspider mite; Rice: Diatraea saccharalis, sugarcane borer; Spodopterafrugiperda, fall armyworm; Spodoptera cosmioides; Spodoptera eridania;Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Colaspis brunnea, grape colaspis;Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, rice water weevil; Sitophilus oryzae, riceweevil; Nephotettix nigropictus, rice leafhopper; Blissus leucopterusleucopterus, chinch bug; Acrosternum hilare, green stink bug; Chilusuppressalis, Asiatic rice borer; Soybean: Pseudoplusia includens,soybean looper; Anticarsia gemmatalis, velvetbean caterpillar;Plathypena scabra, green cloverworm; Ostrinia nubilalis, European cornborer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm;Spodoptera cosmioides; Spodoptera eridania; Heliothis virescens, cottonbudworm; Helicoverpa zea, cotton bollworm; Epilachna varivestis, Mexicanbean beetle; Myzus persicae, green peach aphid; Empoasca fabae, potatoleafhopper; Acrosternum hilare, green stink bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum,redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplus differentialis, differentialgrasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcorn maggot; Sericothrips variabilis,soybean thrips; Thrips tabaci, onion thrips; Tetranychus turkestani,strawberry spider mite; Tetranychus urticae, twospotted spider mite;Barley: Ostrinia nubilalis, European corn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, blackcutworm; Schizaphis graminum, greenbug; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus,chinch bug; Acrosternum hilare, green stink bug; Euschistus servus,brown stink bug; Euschistus heros, neotropical brown stink bug; Deliaplatura, seedcorn maggot; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly; Petrobialatens, brown wheat mite; Oil Seed Rape: Brevicoryne brassicae, cabbageaphid; Phyllotreta cruciferae, Flea beetle; Mamestra configurata, Berthaarmyworm; Plutella xylostella, Diamond-back moth; Delia ssp., Rootmaggots.

Methods for Increasing Plant Yield

Methods for increasing plant yield are provided. The methods compriseproviding a plant or plant cell expressing a polynucleotide encoding thepesticidal polypeptide sequence disclosed herein and growing the plantor a seed thereof in a field infested with (or susceptible toinfestation by) a pest against which said polypeptide has pesticidalactivity. In some embodiments, the polypeptide has pesticidal activityagainst a lepidopteran, coleopteran, dipteran, hemipteran, or nematodepest, and said field is infested with a lepidopteran, hemipteran,coleopteran, dipteran, or nematode pest. As defined herein, the “yield”of the plant refers to the quality and/or quantity of biomass producedby the plant. By “biomass” is intended any measured plant product. Anincrease in biomass production is any improvement in the yield of themeasured plant product. Increasing plant yield has several commercialapplications. For example, increasing plant leaf biomass may increasethe yield of leafy vegetables for human or animal consumption.Additionally, increasing leaf biomass can be used to increase productionof plant-derived pharmaceutical or industrial products. An increase inyield can comprise any statistically significant increase including, butnot limited to, at least a 1% increase, at least a 3% increase, at leasta 5% increase, at least a 10% increase, at least a 20% increase, atleast a 30%, at least a 50%, at least a 70%, at least a 100% or agreater increase in yield compared to a plant not expressing thepesticidal sequence. In specific methods, plant yield is increased as aresult of improved pest resistance of a plant expressing a pesticidalprotein disclosed herein. Expression of the pesticidal protein resultsin a reduced ability of a pest to infest or feed.

The plants can also be treated with one or more chemical compositions,including one or more herbicide, insecticides, or fungicides. Exemplarychemical compositions include: Fruits/Vegetables Herbicides: Atrazine,Bromacil, Diuron, Glyphosate, Linuron, Metribuzin, Simazine,Trifluralin, Fluazifop, Glufosinate, Halosulfuron Gowan, Paraquat,Propyzamide, Sethoxydim, Butafenacil, Halosulfuron, Indaziflam;Fruits/Vegetables Insecticides: Aldicarb, Bacillus thuriengiensis,Carbaryl, Carbofuran, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Deltamethrin,Abamectin, Cyfluthrin/beta-cyfluthrin, Esfenvalerate,Lambda-cyhalothrin, Acequinocyl, Bifenazate, Methoxyfenozide, Novaluron,Chromafenozide, Thiacloprid, Dinotefuran, Fluacrypyrim, Spirodiclofen,Gamma-cyhalothrin, Spiromesifen, Spinosad, Rynaxypyr, Cyazypyr,Triflumuron, Spirotetramat, Imidacloprid, Flubendiamide, Thiodicarb,Metaflumizone, Sulfoxaflor, Cyflumetofen, Cyanopyrafen, Clothianidin,Thiamethoxam, Spinotoram, Thiodicarb, Flonicamid, Methiocarb,Emamectin-benzoate, Indoxacarb, Fenamiphos, Pyriproxifen,Fenbutatin-oxid; Fruits/Vegetables Fungicides: Ametoctradin,Azoxystrobin, Benthiavalicarb, Boscalid, Captan, Carbendazim,Chlorothalonil, Copper, Cyazofamid, Cyflufenamid, Cymoxanil,Cyproconazole, Cyprodinil, Difenoconazole, Dimetomorph, Dithianon,Fenamidone, Fenhexamid, Fluazinam, Fludioxonil, Fluopicolide, Fluopyram,Fluoxastrobin, Fluxapyroxad, Folpet, Fosetyl, Iprodione, Iprovalicarb,Isopyrazam, Kresoxim-methyl, Mancozeb, Mandipropamid,Metalaxyl/mefenoxam, Metiram, Metrafenone, Myclobutanil, Penconazole,Penthiopyrad, Picoxystrobin, Propamocarb, Propiconazole, Propineb,Proquinazid, Prothioconazole, Pyraclostrobin, Pyrimethanil, Quinoxyfen,Spiroxamine, Sulphur, Tebuconazole, Thiophanate-methyl, Trifloxystrobin;Cereals Herbicides: 2.4-D, Amidosulfuron, Bromoxynil, Carfentrazone-E,Chlorotoluron, Chlorsulfuron, Clodinafop-P, Clopyralid, Dicamba,Diclofop-M, Diflufenican, Fenoxaprop, Florasulam, Flucarbazone-NA,Flufenacet, Flupyrosulfuron-M, Fluroxypyr, Flurtamone, Glyphosate,lodosulfuron, loxynil, Isoproturon, MCPA, Mesosulfuron, Metsulfuron,Pendimethalin, Pinoxaden, Propoxycarbazone, Prosulfocarb, Pyroxsulam,Sulfosulfuron, Thifensulfuron, Tralkoxydim, Triasulfuron, Tribenuron,Trifluralin, Tritosulfuron; Cereals Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Bixafen,Boscalid, Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, Cyflufenamid, Cyproconazole,Cyprodinil, Dimoxystrobin, Epoxiconazole, Fenpropidin, Fenpropimorph,Fluopyram, Fluoxastrobin, Fluquinconazole, Fluxapyroxad, Isopyrazam,Kresoxim-methyl, Metconazole, Metrafenone, Penthiopyrad, Picoxystrobin,Prochloraz, Propiconazole, Proquinazid, Prothioconazole, Pyraclostrobin,Quinoxyfen, Spiroxamine, Tebuconazole, Thiophanate-methyl,Trifloxystrobin; Cereals Insecticides: Dimethoate, Lambda-cyhalthrin,Deltamethrin, alpha-Cypermethrin, β-cyfluthrin, Bifenthrin,Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid,Dinetofuran, Clorphyriphos, Pirimicarb, Methiocarb, Sulfoxaflor; MaizeHerbicides: Atrazine, Alachlor, Bromoxynil, Acetochlor, Dicamba,Clopyralid, (S-)Dimethenamid, Glufosinate, Glyphosate, Isoxaflutole,(S-)Metolachlor, Mesotrione, Nicosulfuron, Primisulfuron, Rimsulfuron,Sulcotrione, Foramsulfuron, Topramezone, Tembotrione, Saflufenacil,Thiencarbazone, Flufenacet, Pyroxasulfon; Maize Insecticides:Carbofuran, Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin, Fipronil, Imidacloprid,Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Tefluthrin, Terbufos, Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin,Spiromesifen, Flubendiamide, Triflumuron, Rynaxypyr, Deltamethrin,Thiodicarb, β-Cyfluthrin, Cypermethrin, Bifenthrin, Lufenuron,Tebupirimphos, Ethiprole, Cyazypyr, Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid,Dinetofuran, Avermectin; Maize Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Bixafen,Boscalid, Cyproconazole, Dimoxystrobin, Epoxiconazole, Fenitropan,Fluopyram, Fluoxastrobin, Fluxapyroxad, Isopyrazam, Metconazole,Penthiopyrad, Picoxystrobin, Propiconazole, Prothioconazole,Pyraclostrobin, Tebuconazole, Trifloxystrobin; Rice Herbicides:Butachlor, Propanil, Azimsulfuron, Bensulfuron, Cyhalofop, Daimuron,Fentrazamide, Imazosulfuron, Mefenacet, Oxaziclomefone, Pyrazosulfuron,Pyributicarb, Quinclorac, Thiobencarb, Indanofan, Flufenacet,Fentrazamide, Halosulfuron, Oxaziclomefone, Benzobicyclon, Pyriftalid,Penoxsulam, Bispyribac, Oxadiargyl, Ethoxysulfuron, Pretilachlor,Mesotrione, Tefuryltrione, Oxadiazone, Fenoxaprop, Pyrimisulfan; RiceInsecticides: Diazinon, Fenobucarb, Benfuracarb, Buprofezin,Dinotefuran, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, Isoprocarb, Thiacloprid,Chromafenozide, Clothianidin, Ethiprole, Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr,Deltamethrin, Acetamiprid, Thiamethoxam, Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram,Emamectin-Benzoate, Cypermethrin, Chlorpyriphos, Etofenprox, Carbofuran,Benfuracarb, Sulfoxaflor; Rice Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Carbendazim,Carpropamid, Diclocymet, Difenoconazole, Edifenphos, Ferimzone,Gentamycin, Hexaconazole, Hymexazol, Iprobenfos (IBP), Isoprothiolane,Isotianil, Kasugamycin, Mancozeb, Metominostrobin, Orysastrobin,Pencycuron, Probenazole, Propiconazole, Propineb, Pyroquilon,Tebuconazole, Thiophanate-methyl, Tiadinil, Tricyclazole,Trifloxystrobin, Validamycin; Cotton Herbicides: Diuron, Fluometuron,MSMA, Oxyfluorfen, Prometryn, Trifluralin, Carfentrazone, Clethodim,Fluazifop-butyl, Glyphosate, Norflurazon, Pendimethalin,Pyrithiobac-sodium, Trifloxysulfuron, Tepraloxydim, Glufosinate,Flumioxazin, Thidiazuron; Cotton Insecticides: Acephate, Aldicarb,Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Deltamethrin, Abamectin, Acetamiprid,Emamectin Benzoate, Imidacloprid, Indoxacarb, Lambda-Cyhalothrin,Spinosad, Thiodicarb, Gamma-Cyhalothrin, Spiromesifen, Pyridalyl,Flonicamid Flubendiamide, Triflumuron, Rynaxypyr, Beta-Cyfluthrin,Spirotetramat, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Thiacloprid, Dinetofuran,Flubendiamide, Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram, gamma Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Thiodicarb, Avermectin, Flonicamid, Pyridalyl, Spiromesifen,Sulfoxaflor; Cotton Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Bixafen, Boscalid,Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, Copper, Cyproconazole, Difenoconazole,Dimoxystrobin, Epoxiconazole, Fenamidone, Fluazinam, Fluopyram,Fluoxastrobin, Fluxapyroxad, Iprodione, Isopyrazam, Isotianil, Mancozeb,Maneb, Metominostrobin, Penthiopyrad, Picoxystrobin, Propineb,Prothioconazole, Pyraclostrobin, Quintozene, Tebuconazole,Tetraconazole, Thiophanate-methyl, Trifloxystrobin; Soybean Herbicides:Alachlor, Bentazone, Trifluralin, Chlorimuron-Ethyl, Cloransulam-Methyl,Fenoxaprop, Fomesafen, Fluazifop, Glyphosate, Imazamox, Imazaquin,Imazethapyr, (S-)Metolachlor, Metribuzin, Pendimethalin, Tepraloxydim,Glufosinate; Soybean Insecticides: Lambda-cyhalothrin, Methomyl,Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam, Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid,Dinetofuran, Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr, Cyazypyr, Spinosad, Spinotoram,Emamectin-Benzoate, Fipronil, Ethiprole, Deltamethrin, 13-Cyfluthrin,gamma and lambda Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Spirotetramat, Spinodiclofen, Triflumuron, Flonicamid, Thiodicarb,beta-Cyfluthrin; Soybean Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Bixafen, Boscalid,Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, Copper, Cyproconazole, Difenoconazole,Dimoxystrobin, Epoxiconazole, Fluazinam, Fluopyram, Fluoxastrobin,Flutriafol, Fluxapyroxad, Isopyrazam, Iprodione, Isotianil, Mancozeb,Maneb, Metconazole, Metominostrobin, Myclobutanil, Penthiopyrad,Picoxystrobin, Propiconazole, Propineb, Prothioconazole, Pyraclostrobin,Tebuconazole, Tetraconazole, Thiophanate-methyl, Trifloxystrobin;Sugarbeet Herbicides: Chloridazon, Desmedipham, Ethofumesate,Phenmedipham, Triallate, Clopyralid, Fluazifop, Lenacil, Metamitron,Quinmerac, Cycloxydim, Triflusulfuron, Tepraloxydim, Quizalofop;Sugarbeet Insecticides: Imidacloprid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam,Thiacloprid, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran, Deltamethrin, 13-Cyfluthrin,gamma/lambda Cyhalothrin,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on,Tefluthrin, Rynaxypyr, Cyaxypyr, Fipronil, Carbofuran; CanolaHerbicides: Clopyralid, Diclofop, Fluazifop, Glufosinate, Glyphosate,Metazachlor, Trifluralin Ethametsulfuron, Quinmerac, Quizalofop,Clethodim, Tepraloxydim; Canola Fungicides: Azoxystrobin, Bixafen,Boscalid, Carbendazim, Cyproconazole, Difenoconazole, Dimoxystrobin,Epoxiconazole, Fluazinam, Fluopyram, Fluoxastrobin, Flusilazole,Fluxapyroxad, Iprodione, Isopyrazam, Mepiquat-chloride, Metconazole,Metominostrobin, Paclobutrazole, Penthiopyrad, Picoxystrobin,Prochloraz, Prothioconazole, Pyraclostrobin, Tebuconazole,Thiophanate-methyl, Trifloxystrobin, Vinclozolin; Canola Insecticides:Carbofuran, Thiacloprid, Deltamethrin, Imidacloprid, Clothianidin,Thiamethoxam, Acetamiprid, Dinetofuran, 1-Cyfluthrin, gamma and lambdaCyhalothrin, tau-Fluvaleriate, Ethiprole, Spinosad, Spinotoram,Flubendiamide, Rynaxypyr, Cyazypyr,4-[[(6-Chlorpyridin-3-yl)methyl](2,2-difluorethyl)amino]furan-2(5H)-on.

Methods of Introducing Gene of the Invention into Another Plant

Also provided herein are methods of introducing the nucleic acid of theinvention into another plant. The nucleic acid of the invention, or afragment thereof, can be introduced into second plant by recurrentselection, backcrossing, pedigree breeding, line selection, massselection, mutation breeding and/or genetic marker enhanced selection.

Thus, in one embodiment, the methods of the invention comprise crossinga first plant comprising a nucleic acid of the invention with a secondplant to produce F1 progeny plants and selecting F1 progeny plants thatcomprise the nucleic acid of the invention. The methods may furthercomprise crossing the selected progeny plants with the first plantcomprising the nucleic acid of the invention to produce backcrossprogeny plants and selecting backcross progeny plants that comprise thenucleic acid of the invention. Methods for evaluating pesticidalactivity are provided elsewhere herein. The methods may further compriserepeating these steps one or more times in succession to produceselected second or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise thenucleic acid of the invention.

Any breeding method involving selection of plants for the desiredphenotype can be used in the method of the present invention. In someembodiments, The F1 plants may be self-pollinated to produce asegregating F2 generation. Individual plants may then be selected whichrepresent the desired phenotype (e.g., pesticidal activity) in eachgeneration (F3, F4, F5, etc.) until the traits are homozygous or fixedwithin a breeding population.

The second plant can be a plant having a desired trait, such asherbicide tolerance, insect tolerance, drought tolerance, nematodecontrol, water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, improvednutritional value, disease resistance, improved photosynthesis, improvedfiber quality, stress tolerance, improved reproduction, and the like.The second plant may be an elite event as described elsewhere herein

In various embodiments, plant parts (whole plants, plant organs (e.g.,leaves, stems, roots, etc.), seeds, plant cells, propagules, embryos,and the like) can be harvested from the resulting cross and eitherpropagated or collected for downstream use (such as food, feed, biofuel,oil, flour, meal, etc).

Methods of Obtaining a Plant Product

The present invention also relates to a process for obtaining acommodity product, comprising harvesting and/or milling the grains froma crop comprising a nucleic acid of the invention to obtain thecommodity product. Agronomically and commercially important productsand/or compositions of matter including but not limited to animal feed,commodities, and plant products and by-products that are intended foruse as food for human consumption or for use in compositions andcommodities that are intended for human consumption, particularlydevitalized seed/grain products, including a (semi-)processed productsproduced from such grain/seeds, wherein said product is or compriseswhole or processed seeds or grain, animal feed, corn or soy meal, cornor soy flour, corn, corn starch, soybean meal, soy flour, flakes, soyprotein concentrate, soy protein isolates, texturized soy proteinconcentrate, cosmetics, hair care products, soy nut butter, natto,tempeh, hydrolyzed soy protein, whipped topping, shortening, lecithin,edible whole soybeans (raw, roasted, or as edamame), soy yogurt, soycheese, tofu, yuba, as well as cooked, polished, steamed, baked orparboiled grain, and the like are intended to be within the scope of thepresent invention if these products and compositions of matter containdetectable amounts of the nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences setforth herein as being diagnostic for any plant containing suchnucleotide sequences.

The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by wayof limitation.

EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLES Example 1. Discovery of Novel Pesticidal Genesfrom Pseudomonas putida

Novel pesticidal genes were identified from bacterial strain ATX83556using the following steps:

-   -   Preparation of total DNA from the strain. Total DNA contains        both genomic DNA and extrachromosomal DNA. Extrachromosomal DNA        contains a mixture of some or all of the following: plasmids of        various size; phage chromosomes; other uncharacterized        extrachromosomal molecules.    -   Sequencing of the DNA. Total DNA is sequenced via        Next-Generation Sequencing methods.    -   Identification of putative toxin genes via homology and/or other        computational analyses.    -   When required, sequence finishing of the gene of interest by one        of several PCR or cloning strategies (e.g. TAIL-PCR).

TABLE 1 Novel gene identified from strain ATX83556 Molecular NucleotideAmino weight SEQ ID acid SEQ Gene name (kD) Closest homolog NO ID NOAxmi554 31 25% Cry64Aa1 1 4 Axmi554(alt 5* start) 6* 7* 8* 9* 10*  11* *Proteins encoded from a downstream start site relative to Axmi554.

The toxin gene disclosed herein is amplified by PCR from pAX980, and thePCR product is cloned into the Bacillus expression vector pAX916, oranother suitable vector, by methods well known in the art. The resultingBacillus strain, containing the vector with axmi gene is cultured on aconventional growth media, such as CYS media (10 g/l Bacto-casitone; 3g/l yeast extract; 6 g/l KH₂PO₄; 14 g/l K₂HPO₄; 0.5 mM MgSO₄; 0.05 mMMnCl₂; 0.05 mM FeSO₄), until sporulation is evident by microscopicexamination. Samples are prepared and tested for activity in bioassays.

Example 2. Assays for Pesticidal Activity

The nucleotide sequences of the invention can be tested for theirability to produce pesticidal proteins. The ability of a pesticidalprotein to act as a pesticide upon a pest is often assessed in a numberof ways. One way well known in the art is to perform a feeding assay. Insuch a feeding assay, one exposes the pest to a sample containing eithercompounds to be tested or control samples. Often this is performed byplacing the material to be tested, or a suitable dilution of suchmaterial, onto a material that the pest will ingest, such as anartificial diet. The material to be tested may be composed of a liquid,solid, or slurry. The material to be tested may be placed upon thesurface and then allowed to dry. Alternatively, the material to betested may be mixed with a molten artificial diet, and then dispensedinto the assay chamber. The assay chamber may be, for example, a cup, adish, or a well of a microtiter plate.

Assays for sucking pests (for example aphids) may involve separating thetest material from the insect by a partition, ideally a portion that canbe pierced by the sucking mouth parts of the sucking insect, to allowingestion of the test material. Often the test material is mixed with afeeding stimulant, such as sucrose, to promote ingestion of the testcompound.

Other types of assays can include microinjection of the test materialinto the mouth, or gut of the pest, as well as development of transgenicplants, followed by test of the ability of the pest to feed upon thetransgenic plant. Plant testing may involve isolation of the plant partsnormally consumed, for example, small cages attached to a leaf, orisolation of entire plants in cages containing insects.

Other methods and approaches to assay pests are known in the art, andcan be found, for example in Robertson and Preisler, eds. (1992)Pesticide bioassays with arthropods, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.Alternatively, assays are commonly described in the journals ArthropodManagement Tests and Journal of Economic Entomology or by discussionwith members of the Entomological Society of America (ESA).

In some embodiments, the DNA regions encoding the toxin region of thepesticidal proteins disclosed herein are cloned into the E. coliexpression vector pMAL-C4x behind the malE gene coding for Maltosebinding protein (MBP). These in-frame fusions result in MBP-Axmi fusionproteins expression in E. coli.

For expression in E. coli, BL21*DE3 are transformed with individualplasmids. Single colonies are inoculated in LB supplemented withcarbenicillin and glucose, and grown overnight at 37° C. The followingday, fresh medium is inoculated with 1% of overnight culture and grownat 37° C. to logarithmic phase. Subsequently, cultures are induced with0.3 mM IPTG overnight at 20° C. Each cell pellet is suspended in 20 mMTris-Cl buffer, pH 7.4+200 mM NaCl+1 mM DTT+protease inhibitors andsonicated. Analysis by SDS-PAGE can be used to confirm expression of thefusion proteins.

Total cell free extracts are then run over amylose column attached tofast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) for affinity purification ofMBP-axmi fusion proteins. Bound fusion proteins are eluted from theresin with 10 mM maltose solution. Purified fusion proteins are thencleaved with either Factor Xa or trypsin to remove the amino terminalMBP tag from the Axmi protein. Cleavage and solubility of the proteinscan be determined by SDS-PAGE

Example 3. Expression and Purification

Axmi554.1 and Axmi554.2 were expressed and assayed for bioactivity. E.coli optimized genes (SEQ ID NO:2 and 3, respectively which encode theamino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:4 and 5, respectively) weresynthesized for expression and cloned into a pMalC4X expression vector.The clones were confirmed by sequencing. pGen554-1 and pGen554-2 weretransformed in B121 competent cells for expression of the proteins. Asingle colony from each freshly transformed plate was inoculated in LBmedia and grown at 37° C. until log phase, and induced with 1 mM IPTG at18° C. for 18 hours. Purified Axmi554.1 and Axmi554.2 were submitted tobioassay vs. selected insect pests according to standard protocol. Theresults are shown in Tables 1-4.

TABLE 1 Activity of Axmi554.1 Pest Group Stunting Score MortalityPercentage Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW) 0.66  0% Heliothis virescens (Hv)4  0% Helicoverpa zea (Hz) 2  0% Anticarsia gemmatalis (VBC) 4 100%Agrotis ipsilon (BCW) 0.5  0% Plutella xylostella (DBM) 4 100% Diatraeagrandiosella (SWCB) 3  66% Diatraea crambidoides (SCB) 3.7  75%Spodoptera exigua (BAW) 3  58% Chrysodeixis includens (SBL) 1.7  0% L.hesperus 4 100% Halyomorpha halys (BMSB) 2 100% Helicoverpa armigera(Ha) 4 100% Myzus persicae (GPA) 4 100% Aphis glycines (SBA) 4 100%Nilaparvata lugens (BPH) 2  50% Nezara viridula (SGSB) 4 100% Euschistusservus (BSB) 4 100% Anthonomus grandis 4  75%

TABLE 2 Activity of Axmi554.1 Leaf Damage Pest Group Score Leptinotarsadecemlineata (CPB) 3.5

TABLE 3 Activity of Axmi554.2 Pest Group Stunting Score MortalityPercentage Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW) 1.7  6% Heliothis virescens (Hv)4  16% Helicoverpa zea (Hz) 2.3  0% Anticarsia gemmatalis (VBC) 4 100%Agrotis ipsilon (BCW) 1  0% Plutella xylostella (DBM) 4 100% Diatraeagrandiosella (SWCB) 2.7  66% Diatraea crambidoides (SCB) 2  42%Spodoptera exigua (BAW) 2.7  66% Chrysodeixis includens (SBL) 3  16% L.hesperus 4 100% Halyomorpha halys (BMSB) 2 100% Helicoverpa armigera(Ha) 4 100% Myzus persicae (GPA) 4 100% Aphis glycines (SBA) 4 100%Nilaparvata lugens (BPH) 2  50% Nezara viridula (SGSB) 4 100% Euschistusservus (BSB) 4 100% Anthonomus grandis 4  75%

TABLE 4 Activity of Axmi554.2 Leaf Damage Pest Group Score Leptinotarsadecemlineata (CPB) 3.3

Example 4. Vectoring of Genes for Plant Expression

The coding regions of the invention are connected with appropriatepromoter and terminator sequences for expression in plants. Suchsequences are well known in the art and may include the rice actinpromoter or maize ubiquitin promoter for expression in monocots, theArabidopsis UBQ3 promoter or CaMV 35S promoter for expression in dicots,and the nos or PinII terminators. Techniques for producing andconfirming promoter-gene-terminator constructs also are well known inthe art.

In one aspect of the invention, synthetic DNA sequences are designed andgenerated. These synthetic sequences have altered nucleotide sequencerelative to the parent sequence, but encode proteins that areessentially identical to the parent sequence.

In another aspect of the invention, modified versions of the syntheticgenes are designed such that the resulting peptide is targeted to aplant organelle, such as the endoplasmic reticulum or the apoplast.Peptide sequences known to result in targeting of fusion proteins toplant organelles are known in the art. For example, the N-terminalregion of the acid phosphatase gene from the White Lupin Lupinus albus(GENBANK® ID GI: 14276838, Miller et al. (2001) Plant Physiology 127:594-606) is known in the art to result in endoplasmic reticulumtargeting of heterologous proteins. If the resulting fusion protein alsocontains an endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence comprising thepeptide N-terminus-lysine-aspartic acid-glutamic acid-leucine (i.e., the“KDEL” motif, SEQ ID NO: 11) at the C-terminus, the fusion protein willbe targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. If the fusion protein lacks anendoplasmic reticulum targeting sequence at the C-terminus, the proteinwill be targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum, but will ultimately besequestered in the apoplast.

Thus, this gene encodes a fusion protein that contains the N-terminalthirty-one amino acids of the acid phosphatase gene from the White LupinLupinus albus (GENBANK® ID GI: 14276838, Miller et al., 2001, supra)fused to the N-terminus of the amino acid sequence of the invention, aswell as the KDEL (SEQ ID NO: 11) sequence at the C-terminus. Thus, theresulting protein is predicted to be targeted the plant endoplasmicreticulum upon expression in a plant cell.

The plant expression cassettes described above are combined with anappropriate plant selectable marker to aid in the selection oftransformed cells and tissues, and ligated into plant transformationvectors. These may include binary vectors from Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation or simple plasmid vectors for aerosol or biolistictransformation.

Example 5. Soybean Transformation

Soybean transformation is achieved using methods well known in the art,such as the one described using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediatedtransformation soybean half-seed explants using essentially the methoddescribed by Paz et al. (2006), Plant cell Rep. 25:206. Transformantsare identified using tembotrione as selection marker. The appearance ofgreen shoots was observed, and documented as an indicator of toleranceto the herbicide isoxaflutole or tembotrione. The tolerant transgenicshoots will show normal greening comparable to wild-type soybean shootsnot treated with isoxaflutole or tembotrione, whereas wild-type soybeanshoots treated with the same amount of isoxaflutole or tembotrione willbe entirely bleached. This indicates that the presence of the HPPDprotein enables the tolerance to HPPD inhibitor herbicides, likeisoxaflutole or tembotrione.

Tolerant green shoots are transferred to rooting media or grafted.Rooted plantlets are transferred to the greenhouse after an acclimationperiod. Plants containing the transgene are then sprayed with HPPDinhibitor herbicides, as for example with tembotrione at a rate of 100 gAI/ha or with mesotrione at a rate of 300 g AI/ha supplemented withammonium sulfate methyl ester rapeseed oil. Ten days after theapplication the symptoms due to the application of the herbicide areevaluated and compared to the symptoms observed on wild type plantsunder the same conditions.

Example 6: Cotton T0 Plant Establishment and Selection

Cotton transformation is achieved using methods well known in the art,especially preferred method in the one described in the PCT patentpublication WO 00/71733. Regenerated plants are transferred to thegreenhouse. Following an acclimation period, sufficiently grown plantsare sprayed with HPPD inhibitor herbicides as for example tembotrioneequivalent to 100 or 200 gAI/ha supplemented with ammonium sulfate andmethyl ester rapeseed oil. Seven days after the spray application, thesymptoms due to the treatment with the herbicide are evaluated andcompared to the symptoms observed on wild type cotton plants subjectedto the same treatment under the same conditions.

Example 7. Transformation of Maize Cells with the Pesticidal ProteinGenes Described Herein

Maize ears are best collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos areisolated from the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size arepreferred for use in transformation. Embryos are plated scutellumside-up on a suitable incubation media, such as DN62A5S media (3.98 g/LN6 Salts; 1 mL/L (of 1000× Stock) N6 Vitamins; 800 mg/L L-Asparagine;100 mg/L Myo-inositol; 1.4 g/L L-Proline; 100 mg/L Casamino acids; 50g/L sucrose; 1 mL/L (of 1 mg/mL Stock) 2,4-D). However, media and saltsother than DN62A5S are suitable and are known in the art. Embryos areincubated overnight at 25° C. in the dark. However, it is not necessaryper se to incubate the embryos overnight.

The resulting explants are transferred to mesh squares (30-40 perplate), transferred onto osmotic media for about 30-45 minutes, thentransferred to a beaming plate (see, for example, PCT Publication No.WO/0138514 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,842).

DNA constructs designed to the genes of the invention in plant cells areaccelerated into plant tissue using an aerosol beam accelerator, usingconditions essentially as described in PCT Publication No. WO/0138514.After beaming, embryos are incubated for about 30 min on osmotic media,and placed onto incubation media overnight at 25° C. in the dark. Toavoid unduly damaging beamed explants, they are incubated for at least24 hours prior to transfer to recovery media. Embryos are then spreadonto recovery period media, for about 5 days, 25° C. in the dark, thentransferred to a selection media. Explants are incubated in selectionmedia for up to eight weeks, depending on the nature and characteristicsof the particular selection utilized. After the selection period, theresulting callus is transferred to embryo maturation media, until theformation of mature somatic embryos is observed. The resulting maturesomatic embryos are then placed under low light, and the process ofregeneration is initiated by methods known in the art. The resultingshoots are allowed to root on rooting media, and the resulting plantsare transferred to nursery pots and propagated as transgenic plants.

Materials DN62A5S Media

Components Per Liter Source Chu's N6 Basal Salt Mixture 3.98 g/L Phytotechnology Labs (Prod. No. C 416) Chu's N6 Vitamin Solution 1 mL/L(of Phytotechnology Labs (Prod. No. C 149) 1000x Stock) L-Asparagine 800mg/L Phytotechnology Labs Myo-inositol 100 mg/L Sigma L-Proline 1.4 g/LPhytotechnology Labs Casamino acids 100 mg/L Fisher Scientific Sucrose 50 g/L Phytotechnology Labs 2,4-D (Prod. No. D-7299) 1 mL/L (of 1 Sigmamg/mL Stock)

The pH of the solution is adjusted to pH 5.8 with 1N KOH/1N KCl, Gelrite(Sigma) is added at a concentration up to 3 g/L, and the media isautoclaved. After cooling to 50° C., 2 ml/L of a 5 mg/ml stock solutionof silver nitrate (Phytotechnology Labs) is added.

Example 8. Transformation of Genes of the Invention in Plant Cells byAgrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

Ears are best collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos areisolated from the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size arepreferred for use in transformation. Embryos are plated scutellumside-up on a suitable incubation media, and incubated overnight at 25°C. in the dark. However, it is not necessary per se to incubate theembryos overnight. Embryos are contacted with an Agrobacterium straincontaining the appropriate vectors for Ti plasmid mediated transfer forabout 5-10 min, and then plated onto co-cultivation media for about 3days (22° C. in the dark). After co-cultivation, explants aretransferred to recovery period media for 5-10 days (at 25° C. in thedark). Explants are incubated in selection media for up to eight weeks,depending on the nature and characteristics of the particular selectionutilized. After the selection period, the resulting callus istransferred to embryo maturation media, until the formation of maturesomatic embryos is observed. The resulting mature somatic embryos arethen placed under low light, and the process of regeneration isinitiated as known in the art.

Example 9. Transformation of Rice

Immature rice seeds, containing embryos at the right developmentalstage, are collected from donor plants grown under well controlledconditions in the greenhouse. After sterilization of the seeds, immatureembryos are excised and preinduced on a solid medium for 3 days. Afterpreinduction, embryos are immersed for several minutes in a suspensionof Agrobacterium harboring the desired vectors. Then embryos arecocultivated on a solid medium containing acetosyringone and incubatedin the dark for 4 days. Explants are then transferred to a firstselective medium containing phosphinotricin as selective agent. Afterapproximately 3 weeks, scutella with calli developing were cut intoseveral smaller pieces and transferred to the same selective medium.Subsequent subcultures are performed approximately every 2 weeks. Uponeach subculture, actively growing calli are cut into smaller pieces andincubated on a second selective medium. After several weeks calliclearly resistant to phosphinotricin are transferred to a selectiveregeneration medium. Plantlets generated are cultured on half strengthMS for full elongation. The plants are eventually transferred to soiland grown in the greenhouse.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specificationare indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art towhich this invention pertains. All publications and patent applicationsare herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if eachindividual publication or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail byway of illustration and example for purposes of clarity ofunderstanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modificationsmay be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

That which is claimed:
 1. A recombinant nucleic acid molecule comprisinga nucleotide sequence encoding an amino acid sequence having pesticidalactivity, wherein said nucleotide sequence is selected from the groupconsisting of: a) the nucleotide sequence set forth in any of SEQ IDNO:1-3; b) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprisingthe amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; c) a nucleotidesequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequencehaving at least 95% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of anyof SEQ ID NO:4-11.
 2. The recombinant nucleic acid molecule of claim 1,wherein said nucleotide sequence is a synthetic sequence that has beendesigned for expression in a plant.
 3. The recombinant nucleic acidmolecule of claim 1, wherein said nucleotide sequence is operably linkedto a promoter capable of directing expression of said nucleotidesequence in a plant cell.
 4. A vector comprising the recombinant nucleicacid molecule of claim
 1. 5. The vector of claim 4, further comprising anucleic acid molecule encoding a heterologous polypeptide.
 6. A hostcell that contains the recombinant nucleic acid of claim
 1. 7. The hostcell of claim 6 that is a bacterial host cell.
 8. The host cell of claim6 that is a plant cell.
 9. A transgenic plant comprising the host cellof claim
 8. 10. The transgenic plant of claim 9, wherein said plant isselected from the group consisting of maize, sorghum, wheat, cabbage,sunflower, tomato, crucifers, peppers, potato, cotton, rice, soybean,sugarbeet, sugarcane, tobacco, barley, and oilseed rape.
 11. Atransgenic seed comprising the nucleic acid molecule of claim
 1. 12. Arecombinant polypeptide with pesticidal activity, selected from thegroup consisting of: a) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequenceof any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; and b) a polypeptide comprising an amino acidsequence having at least 95% sequence identity to the amino acidsequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11.
 13. The polypeptide of claim 12further comprising heterologous amino acid sequences.
 14. A compositioncomprising the polypeptide of claim
 12. 15. The composition of claim 14,wherein said composition is selected from the group consisting of apowder, dust, pellet, granule, spray, emulsion, colloid, and solution.16. The composition of claim 14, wherein said composition is prepared bydesiccation, lyophilization, homogenization, extraction, filtration,centrifugation, sedimentation, or concentration of a culture ofbacterial cells.
 17. The composition of claim 14, comprising from about1% to about 99% by weight of said polypeptide.
 18. A method forcontrolling a lepidopteran, hemipteran, coleopteran, nematode, ordipteran pest population comprising contacting said population with apesticidally-effective amount of the polypeptide of claim
 12. 19. Amethod for killing a lepidopteran, hemipteran, coleopteran, nematode, ordipteran pest, comprising contacting said pest with, or feeding to saidpest, a pesticidally-effective amount of the polypeptide of claim 12.20. A method for producing a polypeptide with pesticidal activity,comprising culturing the host cell of claim 6 under conditions in whichthe nucleic acid molecule encoding the polypeptide is expressed.
 21. Aplant or plant cell having stably incorporated into its genome a DNAconstruct comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a protein havingpesticidal activity, wherein said nucleotide sequence is selected fromthe group consisting of: a) the nucleotide sequence set forth in any ofSEQ ID NO:1-3; b) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptidecomprising the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; and c) anucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising an amino acidsequence having at least 95% sequence identity to the amino acidsequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11.
 22. A method for protecting a plantfrom a pest, comprising expressing in a plant or cell thereof anucleotide sequence that encodes a pesticidal polypeptide, wherein saidnucleotide sequence is selected from the group consisting of: a) thenucleotide sequence set forth in any of SEQ ID NO:1-3; b) a nucleotidesequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequenceof any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; and c) a nucleotide sequence that encodes apolypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence having at least 95%sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11.23. The method of claim 22, wherein said plant produces a pesticidalpolypeptide having pesticidal activity against a lepidopteran,hemipteran, coleopteran, nematode, or dipteran pest.
 24. A method forincreasing yield in a plant comprising growing in a field a plant of ora seed thereof having stably incorporated into its genome a DNAconstruct comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a protein havingpesticidal activity, wherein said nucleotide sequence is selected fromthe group consisting of: a) the nucleotide sequence set forth in any ofSEQ ID NO:1-3; b) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptidecomprising the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; and c) anucleotide sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising an amino acidsequence having at least 95% sequence identity to the amino acidsequence of any of SEQ ID NO:4-11; wherein said field is infested with apest against which said polypeptide has pesticidal activity.
 25. Use ofthe nucleic acid of claim 1 for protecting a plant from a pest againstwhich the amino acid encoded by said nucleic acid has pesticidalactivity.
 26. A commodity product comprising the nucleic acid moleculeof claim 1, or a protein encoded thereby, wherein said product isselected from the group consisting of whole or processed seeds or grain,animal feed, corn or soy meal, corn or soy flour, corn starch, soybeanmeal, soy flour, flakes, soy protein concentrate, soy protein isolates,texturized soy protein concentrate, cosmetics, hair care products, soynut butter, natto, tempeh, hydrolyzed soy protein, whipped topping,shortening, lecithin, edible whole soybeans, soy yogurt, soy cheese,tofu, yuba, and cooked, polished, steamed, baked or parboiled grain.